RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs Arc A730M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking264not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.49no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-512AD104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2022 (3 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30725120
Core clock speed1100 MHz1725 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHz2250 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate393.6360.0
Floating-point processing power12.6 TFLOPS23.04 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs192160
Tensor Cores384160
Ray Tracing Cores2440
L1 Cache4.5 MB5 MB
L2 Cache12 MB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB12 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 100 Watt

Arc A730M has 25% lower power consumption.

RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 20% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Arc A730M and RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc A730M is a notebook graphics card while RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A730M
Arc A730M
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 115 votes

Rate Arc A730M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A730M or RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.