GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Arc A730M

Place in performance ranking	135	28
Place by popularity	not in top-100	21
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	40.65
Architecture	Xe HPG (2020−2022)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	Alchemist	AD106
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)	18 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399
Current price	no data	$461 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	4352
Core clock speed	1100 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	2535 MHz
Number of transistors	21,700 million	22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt (80 - 120 Watt TGP)	160 Watt
Texture fill rate	211.2	344.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Arc A730M and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	240 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	no data	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A730M 35.30

RTX 4060 Ti 59.38
+68.2%

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti outperforms Arc A730M by 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Arc A730M 10487

RTX 4060 Ti 22935
+119%

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti outperforms Arc A730M by 119% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	72 −66.7%	120−130 +66.7%
1440p	44 −59.1%	70−75 +59.1%
4K	25 −60%	40−45 +60%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

40−45

−77.5%

71
+77.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −80%	60−65 +80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −82.9%	64 +82.9%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −75.4%	110−120 +75.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −80%	70−75 +80%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −82.9%	64 +82.9%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −73.3%	75−80 +73.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −78%	85−90 +78%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −73.8%	130−140 +73.8%
Hitman 3	30−33 −70%	51 +70%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 −70%	153 +70%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −75%	100−110 +75%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −76%	85−90 +76%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 −78%	178 +78%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −70%	85 +70%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −80%	60−65 +80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −80%	54 +80%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −75.4%	110−120 +75.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −80%	70−75 +80%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −80%	54 +80%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −73.3%	75−80 +73.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −78%	85−90 +78%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −73.8%	130−140 +73.8%
Hitman 3	14−16 −71.4%	24 +71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 −77.5%	140−150 +77.5%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −70.8%	41 +70.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −76%	85−90 +76%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 −75.3%	149 +75.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 −69.2%	110 +69.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −80%	90−95 +80%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −80%	60−65 +80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −77.8%	48 +77.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −80%	70−75 +80%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −73.3%	52 +73.3%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −73.3%	75−80 +73.3%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −73.8%	130−140 +73.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −76%	88 +76%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 −77.1%	124 +77.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −87.5%	45 +87.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −77.8%	48 +77.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55

−76%

85−90
+76%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −91.4%	65−70 +91.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −80%	80−85 +80%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −81%	35−40 +81%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −76.2%	37 +76.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −73.3%	50−55 +73.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −72.2%	31 +72.2%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −80%	60−65 +80%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −82.5%	70−75 +82.5%
Hitman 3	21−24 −85.7%	39 +85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −88.6%	66 +88.6%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −91.4%	65−70 +91.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −86.7%	80−85 +86.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −81.5%	45−50 +81.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −94.4%	35 +94.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40

−71.4%

60−65
+71.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −94.4%	35−40 +94.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −81.3%	27−30 +81.3%
Hitman 3	16−18 −81.3%	27−30 +81.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −83.3%	40−45 +83.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −75%	28 +75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −70.8%	40−45 +70.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −91.7%	21−24 +91.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −75%	21−24 +75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −83.3%	21−24 +83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −100%	20−22 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −81.5%	45−50 +81.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −90.5%	40 +90.5%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −85.7%	39 +85.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 −70%	16−18 +70%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−72.2%

30−35
+72.2%

This is how Arc A730M and RTX 4060 Ti compete in popular games:

RTX 4060 Ti is 67% faster in 1080p
RTX 4060 Ti is 59% faster in 1440p
RTX 4060 Ti is 60% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	35.30	59.38
Recency	30 March 2022	18 May 2023
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	160 Watt