GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Arc A370M

Place in the ranking	386	35
Place by popularity	not in top-100	16
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	83.15
Power efficiency	26.22	25.59
Architecture	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	DG2-128	AD106
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)	18 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	4352
Core clock speed	300 MHz	2310 MHz
Boost clock speed	1550 MHz	2535 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	160 Watt
Texture fill rate	99.20	344.8
Floating-point processing power	3.174 TFLOPS	22.06 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	48
TMUs	64	136
Tensor Cores	no data	136
Ray Tracing Cores	8	34

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	240 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A370M 13.30

RTX 4060 Ti 59.33
+346%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A370M 5115

RTX 4060 Ti 22814
+346%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	38 −321%	160−170 +321%
1440p	21 −329%	90−95 +329%
4K	40 −325%	170−180 +325%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.49
1440p	no data	4.43
4K	no data	2.35

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −317%	100−105 +317%
Cyberpunk 2077	46 −335%	200−210 +335%
Elden Ring	35 −329%	150−160 +329%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −342%	190−200 +342%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −317%	100−105 +317%
Cyberpunk 2077	19 −321%	80−85 +321%
Forza Horizon 4	74 −305%	300−310 +305%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −344%	160−170 +344%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −324%	140−150 +324%
Valorant	50−55 −342%	230−240 +342%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −342%	190−200 +342%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −317%	100−105 +317%
Cyberpunk 2077	13 −323%	55−60 +323%
Dota 2	42 −329%	180−190 +329%
Elden Ring	40−45 −325%	170−180 +325%
Far Cry 5	24 −317%	100−105 +317%
Fortnite	75−80 −300%	300−310 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	62 −335%	270−280 +335%
Grand Theft Auto V	29 −314%	120−130 +314%
Metro Exodus	13 −323%	55−60 +323%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 −308%	400−450 +308%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −324%	140−150 +324%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −325%	170−180 +325%
Valorant	50−55 −342%	230−240 +342%
World of Tanks	170−180 −321%	750−800 +321%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −342%	190−200 +342%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −317%	100−105 +317%
Cyberpunk 2077	11 −309%	45−50 +309%
Dota 2	66 −339%	290−300 +339%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −331%	220−230 +331%
Forza Horizon 4	53 −334%	230−240 +334%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 −308%	400−450 +308%
Valorant	50−55 −342%	230−240 +342%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	11 −309%	45−50 +309%
Elden Ring	20−22 −325%	85−90 +325%
Grand Theft Auto V	11 −309%	45−50 +309%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 −304%	400−450 +304%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −317%	50−55 +317%
World of Tanks	90−95 −326%	400−450 +326%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −344%	120−130 +344%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −317%	50−55 +317%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −300%	40−45 +300%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −319%	130−140 +319%
Forza Horizon 4	37 −332%	160−170 +332%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −329%	120−130 +329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −341%	75−80 +341%
Valorant	30−35 −324%	140−150 +324%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −338%	35−40 +338%
Dota 2	24−27 −317%	100−105 +317%
Elden Ring	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −317%	100−105 +317%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −336%	170−180 +336%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −317%	100−105 +317%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −317%	50−55 +317%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −338%	35−40 +338%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Dota 2	40 −325%	170−180 +325%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −341%	75−80 +341%
Fortnite	14−16 −333%	65−70 +333%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −344%	80−85 +344%
Valorant	14−16 −329%	60−65 +329%

This is how Arc A370M and RTX 4060 Ti compete in popular games:

RTX 4060 Ti is 321% faster in 1080p
RTX 4060 Ti is 329% faster in 1440p
RTX 4060 Ti is 325% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	13.30	59.33
Recency	30 March 2022	18 May 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	160 Watt

Arc A370M has 357.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060 Ti, on the other hand, has a 346.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A370M in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A370M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.