RTX A3000 Mobile vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU

Aggregated performance score

Apple M1 8-Core GPU
2020
14.03

RTX A3000 Mobile outperforms Apple M1 8-Core GPU by 136% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking343151
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameno dataGA104
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date10 November 2020 (3 years old)12 April 2021 (3 years old)

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores84096
Core clock speed1278 MHz1080 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1560 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data130 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rateno data237.6

Size and compatibility

Information on Apple M1 8-Core GPU and RTX A3000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data12 GB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data14000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data336.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkanno data1.2
CUDAno data8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
−254%
99
+254%
1440p18−20
−156%
46
+156%
4K16−18
−163%
42
+163%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−250%
77
+250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−110%
60−65
+110%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−243%
79
+243%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−110%
100−110
+110%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−147%
85−90
+147%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−200%
66
+200%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−208%
111
+208%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−171%
103
+171%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−110%
100−110
+110%
Hitman 3 35−40
−284%
146
+284%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−259%
104
+259%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−121%
50−55
+121%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27
−185%
75−80
+185%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−258%
93
+258%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−110%
60−65
+110%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−196%
68
+196%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−110%
100−110
+110%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−147%
85−90
+147%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−141%
53
+141%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−186%
103
+186%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−158%
98
+158%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−110%
100−110
+110%
Hitman 3 35−40
−226%
124
+226%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−207%
89
+207%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−164%
55−60
+164%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−121%
50−55
+121%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 32
−141%
75−80
+141%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−421%
151
+421%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−231%
86
+231%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−110%
60−65
+110%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−122%
51
+122%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−110%
100−110
+110%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−95.5%
43
+95.5%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−158%
93
+158%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−129%
87
+129%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−110%
100−110
+110%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−110%
61
+110%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−50%
39
+50%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−165%
50−55
+165%
Hitman 3 21−24
−168%
55−60
+168%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−125%
45−50
+125%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−160%
24−27
+160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−167%
45−50
+167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−157%
35−40
+157%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−148%
70−75
+148%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−286%
27
+286%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−200%
69
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−152%
60−65
+152%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−156%
65−70
+156%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−214%
40−45
+214%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−250%
27−30
+250%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−180%
27−30
+180%
Hitman 3 12−14
−146%
30−35
+146%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−214%
21−24
+214%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−213%
24−27
+213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−246%
45
+246%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−175%
21−24
+175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−186%
20−22
+186%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−227%
36
+227%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−143%
30−35
+143%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−142%
45−50
+142%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%

This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and RTX A3000 Mobile compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RTX A3000 Mobile is 254% faster than Apple M1 8-Core GPU

1440p resolution:

  • RTX A3000 Mobile is 156% faster than Apple M1 8-Core GPU

4K resolution:

  • RTX A3000 Mobile is 163% faster than Apple M1 8-Core GPU

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A3000 Mobile is 421% faster than the Apple M1 8-Core GPU.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX A3000 Mobile surpassed Apple M1 8-Core GPU in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 14.03 33.13
Recency 10 November 2020 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 5 nm 8 nm

The RTX A3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 8-Core GPU in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Apple M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
RTX A3000 Mobile

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 872 votes

Rate Apple M1 8-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 117 votes

Rate NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.