RTX A2000 vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU

Aggregate performance score

Apple M1 8-Core GPU
2020
14.05

RTX A2000 outperforms Apple M1 8-Core GPU by a whopping 153% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking347128
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data18.89
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameno dataGA106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date10 November 2020 (3 years ago)10 August 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449
Current priceno data$567 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores83328
Core clock speed1278 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistorsno data12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data124.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Apple M1 8-Core GPU and RTX A2000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data12 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkanno data1.3
CUDAno data8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
−150%
70−75
+150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−150%
55−60
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−141%
70−75
+141%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−139%
55−60
+139%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−139%
110−120
+139%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
−150%
75−80
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−150%
55−60
+150%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−144%
95−100
+144%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−144%
95−100
+144%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−134%
110−120
+134%
Hitman 3 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−144%
110−120
+144%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−138%
100−105
+138%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−144%
95−100
+144%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−144%
95−100
+144%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−141%
70−75
+141%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−139%
55−60
+139%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−139%
110−120
+139%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
−150%
75−80
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−150%
55−60
+150%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−144%
95−100
+144%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−144%
95−100
+144%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−134%
110−120
+134%
Hitman 3 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−144%
110−120
+144%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−138%
100−105
+138%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−144%
95−100
+144%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 19
−137%
45−50
+137%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−141%
70−75
+141%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−141%
70−75
+141%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−139%
55−60
+139%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
−150%
75−80
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−150%
55−60
+150%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−144%
95−100
+144%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−134%
110−120
+134%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−144%
110−120
+144%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−138%
100−105
+138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−141%
70−75
+141%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−144%
95−100
+144%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−141%
65−70
+141%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−140%
60−65
+140%
Hitman 3 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−139%
55−60
+139%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−141%
65−70
+141%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−141%
70−75
+141%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 30−33
−150%
75−80
+150%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Hitman 3 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%

This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and RTX A2000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 is 150% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.05 35.58
Recency 10 November 2020 10 August 2021
Chip lithography 5 nm 8 nm

The RTX A2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 8-Core GPU in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M1 8-Core GPU is a notebook card while RTX A2000 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Apple M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 884 votes

Rate Apple M1 8-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 509 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.