Radeon R9 M395X vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared M1 8-Core GPU and Radeon R9 M395X, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU
2020
13.71
+1.5%

Apple M1 8-Core GPU outperforms R9 M395X by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking379382
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.43
Architectureno dataGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameno dataAmethyst
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date10 November 2020 (4 years ago)5 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores82048
Core clock speed1278 MHz723 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data92.54
Floating-point processing powerno data2.961 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Eyefinity-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno dataNot Listed
Mantle-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+3.8%
24−27
−3.8%
Elden Ring 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+2.3%
40−45
−2.3%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+3.8%
24−27
−3.8%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1.9%
50−55
−1.9%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+1.9%
50−55
−1.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+2.3%
40−45
−2.3%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+3.8%
24−27
−3.8%
Dota 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Elden Ring 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Fortnite 75−80
+1.3%
75−80
−1.3%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1.9%
50−55
−1.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+2.1%
45−50
−2.1%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
+1%
95−100
−1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+2.4%
40−45
−2.4%
Valorant 50−55
+1.9%
50−55
−1.9%
World of Tanks 180−190
+1.1%
180−190
−1.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+2.3%
40−45
−2.3%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+3.8%
24−27
−3.8%
Dota 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1.9%
50−55
−1.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
+1%
95−100
−1%
Valorant 50−55
+1.9%
50−55
−1.9%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Elden Ring 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+4.8%
100−110
−4.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
World of Tanks 95−100
+2.1%
95−100
−2.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+3.1%
30−35
−3.1%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Elden Ring 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Valorant 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%

This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and R9 M395X compete in popular games:

  • Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 13% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 8% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Apple M1 8-Core GPU is ahead in 29 tests (46%)
  • there's a draw in 34 tests (54%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.71 13.51
Recency 10 November 2020 5 May 2015
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm

Apple M1 8-Core GPU has a 1.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between M1 8-Core GPU and Radeon R9 M395X.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Apple M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
AMD Radeon R9 M395X
Radeon R9 M395X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 923 votes

Rate M1 8-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 15 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M395X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.