Quadro P2000 vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU

M1 7-Core GPU M1 8-Core GPU M1 GPU M1 Max 24-Core GPU M1 Max 32-Core GPU M1 Pro 14-Core GPU M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
VS
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2200 Quadro P4000 Quadro P5000 Quadro P6000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared M1 8-Core GPU with Quadro P2000, including specs and performance data.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU
2020
12.71

P2000 outperforms Apple M1 8-Core GPU by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8-Core GPU
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking394313
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.69
Power efficiencyno data17.10
Architectureno dataPascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameno dataGP106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date10 November 2020 (4 years ago)6 February 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$585

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81024
Core clock speed1278 MHz1076 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1480 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data94.72
Floating-point processing powerno data3.031 TFLOPS
ROPsno data40
TMUsno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data201 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data5 GB
Memory bus widthno data160 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1752 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data140.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-+
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU 12.71
Quadro P2000 17.51
+37.8%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU 280200
Quadro P2000 350317
+25%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
−100%
56
+100%
1440p14−16
−42.9%
20
+42.9%
4K10−12
−60%
16
+60%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data10.45
1440pno data29.25
4Kno data36.56

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−42.3%
100−110
+42.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−37%
35−40
+37%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
−47.8%
30−35
+47.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−32.1%
70−75
+32.1%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−42.3%
100−110
+42.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−37%
35−40
+37%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−9.3%
47
+9.3%
Fortnite 70−75
−94.6%
144
+94.6%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−35.2%
70−75
+35.2%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−42.5%
55−60
+42.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
−47.8%
30−35
+47.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−15.2%
53
+15.2%
Valorant 110−120
−22.5%
130−140
+22.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−32.1%
70−75
+32.1%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−42.3%
100−110
+42.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
−22.8%
220−230
+22.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−37%
35−40
+37%
Dota 2 85−90
−20%
102
+20%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+4.9%
41
−4.9%
Fortnite 70−75
+23.3%
60
−23.3%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−35.2%
70−75
+35.2%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−42.5%
55−60
+42.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
−36.7%
65−70
+36.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
−47.8%
30−35
+47.8%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−46.2%
35−40
+46.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+12.2%
41
−12.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−11.8%
38
+11.8%
Valorant 110−120
−22.5%
130−140
+22.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−32.1%
70−75
+32.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−37%
35−40
+37%
Dota 2 85−90
−15.3%
98
+15.3%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+22.9%
35
−22.9%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−35.2%
70−75
+35.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
−47.8%
30−35
+47.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+58.6%
29
−58.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+36%
25
−36%
Valorant 110−120
−22.5%
130−140
+22.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
+64.4%
45
−64.4%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−48%
35−40
+48%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
−34.4%
120−130
+34.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−53.3%
21−24
+53.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−53.2%
160−170
+53.2%
Valorant 130−140
−25.7%
170−180
+25.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+28.6%
21
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−41.9%
40−45
+41.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
−35.7%
18−20
+35.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+16.7%
24
−16.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−87.5%
14−16
+87.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−33.3%
30−35
+33.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+30.8%
13
−30.8%
Valorant 65−70
−43.5%
95−100
+43.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−44.4%
24−27
+44.4%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−87.5%
14−16
+87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Dota 2 45−50
−34.8%
60−65
+34.8%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+44.4%
9
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−40.9%
30−35
+40.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+71.4%
7
−71.4%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+20%
10
−20%

This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and Quadro P2000 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P2000 is 100% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P2000 is 43% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P2000 is 60% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 71% faster.
  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Quadro P2000 is 95% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Apple M1 8-Core GPU is ahead in 13 tests (20%)
  • Quadro P2000 is ahead in 53 tests (80%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 12.71 17.51
Recency 10 November 2020 6 February 2017
Chip lithography 5 nm 16 nm

Apple M1 8-Core GPU has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro P2000, on the other hand, has a 37.8% higher aggregate performance score.

The Quadro P2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the M1 8-Core GPU in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M1 8-Core GPU is a notebook card while Quadro P2000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
RX Vega M GL / 870 Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000
vs
Pro W5500X Radeon Pro W5500X
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
FirePro D500 FirePro D500
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
Quadro P600 Quadro P600
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB P100 PCIe 16 GB
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
4000 Mac Edition Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
HD Graphics HD Graphics

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 933 votes

Rate M1 8-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 695 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about M1 8-Core GPU or Quadro P2000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.