Celeron 6205 vs Xeon L5335
Primary details
Comparing Xeon L5335 and Celeron 6205 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2472 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.11 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Tiger Lake |
| Power efficiency | 2.06 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Clovertown (2006−2007) | Tiger Lake U (2020) |
| Release date | 13 August 2007 (17 years ago) | 1 September 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $380 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon L5335 and Celeron 6205 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2/2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (per die) | 2.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB L2 Cache | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 2x 143 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 60 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 582 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.1V-1.25V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon L5335 and Celeron 6205 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | PLGA771 | BGA1499 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5335 and Celeron 6205. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon L5335 and Celeron 6205 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5335 and Celeron 6205 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5335 and Celeron 6205. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 13 August 2007 | 1 September 2020 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
Xeon L5335 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Celeron 6205, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 550% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon L5335 and Celeron 6205. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon L5335 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 6205 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
