Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 vs VIA C7-M C7-M-1600

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad
Buy on Amazon

Primary Details

Comparing VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesC7-MTransmeta Crusoe
Architecture codenameEstherCrusoe (2001)
Release dateno data1 June 2001 (22 years ago)
Current price$350 no data

Detailed Specifications

VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1 GHz
Bus support400 MHz266 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data512 KB
Chip lithography90 nm130 nm
Die sizeno data55 mm2
Number of transistorsno data36.8 Million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataCBGA-474
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt7 Watt

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 190
+162%
Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 497

Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 outperforms VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 by 162% in wPrime 32.

Pros & Cons Summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 7 Watt

We couldn't decide between VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


VIA C7-M C7-M-1600
C7-M C7-M-1600
Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800
Crusoe TM-5800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 28 votes

Rate VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 92 votes

Rate Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 or Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.