FX-8370 vs Opteron 6276
Aggregated performance score
Opteron 6276 outperforms FX-8370 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Opteron 6276 and FX-8370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1318 | 1328 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.27 | 1.02 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Interlagos (2011−2012) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| Release date | 14 November 2011 (12 years ago) | 2 September 2014 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | no data |
| Current price | $316 (2.7x MSRP) | $202 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Opteron 6276 has 25% better value for money than FX-8370.
Detailed specifications
Opteron 6276 and FX-8370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | 8192 KB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (per die) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 316 mm2 | 315 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 61 °C |
| Number of transistors | 2,400 million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
| P0 Vcore voltage | no data | Min: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 6276 and FX-8370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | 1 |
| Socket | G34 | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6276 and FX-8370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6276 and FX-8370 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6276 and FX-8370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6276 and FX-8370.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | n/a |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Opteron 6276 outperforms FX-8370 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Opteron 6276 outperforms FX-8370 by 1% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
FX-8370 outperforms Opteron 6276 by 41% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Opteron 6276 outperforms FX-8370 by 20% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.06 | 4.01 |
| Recency | 14 November 2011 | 2 September 2014 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 8 |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 125 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Opteron 6276 and FX-8370.
Be aware that Opteron 6276 is a server/workstation processor while FX-8370 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6276 and FX-8370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
