Opteron 6278 vs FX-8370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8370
2014
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
4.03
Opteron 6278
2012
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
8.97
+123%

Opteron 6278 outperforms FX-8370 by a whopping 123% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8370 and Opteron 6278 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1441866
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.85no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.947.11
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Interlagos (2011−2012)
Release date2 September 2014 (10 years ago)1 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8370 and Opteron 6278 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data768 KB
L2 cache8192 KB16 MB
L3 cacheno data8 MB (per die)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2316 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million2,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8370 and Opteron 6278 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14
SocketAM3+G34
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt115 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8370 and Opteron 6278. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8370 and Opteron 6278 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8370 and Opteron 6278. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8370 and Opteron 6278.

PCIe versionn/a2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8370 4.03
Opteron 6278 8.97
+123%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8370 6166
Opteron 6278 13733
+123%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.03 8.97
Recency 2 September 2014 1 May 2012
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 8 16
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 115 Watt

FX-8370 has an age advantage of 2 years.

Opteron 6278, on the other hand, has a 122.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 8.7% lower power consumption.

The Opteron 6278 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8370 in performance tests.

Note that FX-8370 is a desktop processor while Opteron 6278 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8370 and Opteron 6278, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8370
FX-8370
AMD Opteron 6278
Opteron 6278

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 375 votes

Rate FX-8370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 12 votes

Rate Opteron 6278 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8370 or Opteron 6278, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.