FX-8370E vs Opteron 6276
Aggregate performance score
Opteron 6276 outperforms FX-8370E by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1673 | 1832 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.66 | 0.70 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 3.36 | 3.41 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Interlagos (2011−2012) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| Release date | 14 November 2011 (14 years ago) | 2 September 2014 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | $199 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Opteron 6276 has 137% better value for money than FX-8370E.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Opteron 6276 and FX-8370E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per module) | 8192 KB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (per die) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 2x 315 mm2 | 315 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 71 °C |
| Number of transistors | 2,400 million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| P0 Vcore voltage | no data | Min: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 V |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 6276 and FX-8370E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | 1 |
| Socket | G34 | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6276 and FX-8370E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6276 and FX-8370E are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6276 and FX-8370E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6276 and FX-8370E.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | n/a |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.60 | 3.02 |
| Recency | 14 November 2011 | 2 September 2014 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 8 |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 95 Watt |
Opteron 6276 has a 19.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
FX-8370E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 21.1% lower power consumption.
The AMD Opteron 6276 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD FX-8370E in performance tests.
Be aware that Opteron 6276 is a server/workstation processor while FX-8370E is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
