Atom C3338 vs FX-8800P

Primary details

Comparing FX-8800P and Atom C3338 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	1987	2720
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.06
Market segment	Laptop	Server
Series	AMD Carrizo	Intel Atom
Architecture codename	Carrizo (2015−2018)	Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date	2 June 2015 (9 years ago)	22 February 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$27

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

FX-8800P and Atom C3338 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	2
Base clock speed	2.1 GHz	1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.4 GHz	2.2 GHz
Multiplier	no data	15
L1 cache	no data	112 KB
L2 cache	2048 KB	4 MB
L3 cache	no data	4 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Die size	250 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	89 °C
Number of transistors	3,100 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on FX-8800P and Atom C3338 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket	FP4	FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	8.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8800P and Atom C3338. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	HSA 1.0	no data
AES-NI	+	+
FMA	+	-
AVX	+	-
FRTC	+	-
FreeSync	+	-
DualGraphics	+	-
TrueAudio	+	-
PowerNow	+	-
PowerGating	+	-
Out-of-band client management	+	-
VirusProtect	+	-
HSA	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+
QuickAssist	no data	-
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	-
Status	no data	Launched

Security technologies

FX-8800P and Atom C3338 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB	no data	+
Secure Boot	no data	+
Secure Key	no data	+
SGX	no data	-
OS Guard	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8800P and Atom C3338 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	-
VT-d	no data	+
VT-x	no data	+
EPT	no data	+
IOMMU 2.0	+	-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8800P and Atom C3338. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3-2133	DDR4: 1866
Maximum memory size	no data	128 GB
Max memory channels	2	1
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	14.936 GB/s
ECC memory support	-	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics	no data
iGPU core count	8	no data
Enduro	+	-
Switchable graphics	+	-
UVD	+	-
VCE	+	-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-8800P and Atom C3338 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-8800P and Atom C3338 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	no data
Vulkan	+	-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8800P and Atom C3338.

PCIe version	3.0	3
PCI Express lanes	8	10
USB revision	no data	3
Total number of SATA ports	no data	10
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports	no data	10
Number of USB ports	no data	8
Integrated LAN	no data	4x2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	1.87	0.67
Recency	2 June 2015	22 February 2017
Physical cores	4	2
Threads	4	2
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	8 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8800P and Atom C3338, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---