Ryzen 7 2800H vs Celeron M U3400

Place in the ranking	3121	1213
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron M	AMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency	1.52	32.37
Architecture codename	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Raven Ridge (Zen) (2018)
Release date	24 May 2010 (14 years ago)	10 September 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 2800H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	2	8
Base clock speed	no data	3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.06 GHz	3.3 GHz
Bus rate	2500 MHz	no data
Multiplier	no data	33
L1 cache	no data	384 KB
L2 cache	512 KB	2 MB
L3 cache	2 MB	4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	32 nm	14 nm
Die size	81+114 mm²	209.78 mm²
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	95 °C
Number of transistors	382+177 Million	4950 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 2800H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket	BGA1288	FP5
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 2800H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data
Precision Boost 2	no data	+

Security technologies

Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 2800H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB

no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 2800H are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-x	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 2800H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR4
Maximum memory size	no data	32 GB
Max memory channels	no data	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support	-	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 ( - 1300 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 2800H.

PCIe version	no data	3.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	12

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.29	5.13
Recency	24 May 2010	10 September 2018
Physical cores	2	4
Threads	2	8
Chip lithography	32 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	45 Watt

Celeron M U3400 has 150% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 2800H, on the other hand, has a 1669% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 2800H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M U3400 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 2800H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.