Ryzen 7 4980U vs Celeron M U3400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M U3400
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 512 Watt
0.26
Ryzen 7 4980U
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
9.91
+3712%

Ryzen 7 4980U outperforms Celeron M U3400 by a whopping 3712% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3405904
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron MAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Power efficiencyno data70.84
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021)
Release date24 May 2010 (15 years ago)13 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 4980U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.06 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rate2500 MHzno data
Multiplierno data20
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size81+114 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Million9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 4980U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA1288FP6
Power consumption (TDP)512 KB + 2 MB15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 4980U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 4980U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 4980U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 4980U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1950 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 4980U.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron M U3400 0.26
Ryzen 7 4980U 9.91
+3712%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron M U3400 1205
Ryzen 7 4980U 5715
+374%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron M U3400 2317
Ryzen 7 4980U 35106
+1415%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.26 9.91
Recency 24 May 2010 13 April 2021
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 512 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 7 4980U has a 3711.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 3313.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 7 4980U is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron M U3400 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M U3400
Celeron M U3400
AMD Ryzen 7 4980U
Ryzen 7 4980U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 4 votes

Rate Celeron M U3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 53 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 4980U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 7 4980U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.