Celeron M U3400 vs A8-7200P

VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-7200P
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.36
+369%
Celeron M U3400
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.29

A8-7200P outperforms Celeron M U3400 by a whopping 369% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-7200P and Celeron M U3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22523121
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD KaveriIntel Celeron M
Power efficiency3.681.52
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)24 May 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-7200P and Celeron M U3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz1.06 GHz
Bus rateno data2500 MHz
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size245 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature102 °C105 °C
Number of transistors2410 Million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A8-7200P and Celeron M U3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP3BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7200P and Celeron M U3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

A8-7200P and Celeron M U3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7200P and Celeron M U3400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7200P and Celeron M U3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count4no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-7200P and Celeron M U3400 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-7200P and Celeron M U3400 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7200P and Celeron M U3400.

PCIe version3.0no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.36 0.29
Recency 4 June 2014 24 May 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 18 Watt

A8-7200P has a 369% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M U3400, on the other hand, has 94.4% lower power consumption.

The A8-7200P is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M U3400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7200P and Celeron M U3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-7200P
A8-7200P
Intel Celeron M U3400
Celeron M U3400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 5 votes

Rate A8-7200P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 4 votes

Rate Celeron M U3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-7200P or Celeron M U3400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.