A6-7000 vs Celeron M U3400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M U3400
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 512 Watt
0.26

A6-7000 outperforms Celeron M U3400 by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking34063068
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron MAMD Kaveri
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date24 May 2010 (15 years ago)1 June 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M U3400 and A6-7000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.06 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate2500 MHzno data
L2 cache512 KB1024 KB
L3 cache2 MBno data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M U3400 and A6-7000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA1288FT3
Power consumption (TDP)512 KB + 2 MB1 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M U3400 and A6-7000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
FRTC-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron M U3400 and A6-7000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M U3400 and A6-7000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M U3400 and A6-7000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R4 Graphics
iGPU core countno data3
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M U3400 and A6-7000 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron M U3400 and A6-7000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M U3400 and A6-7000.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.26 0.57
Recency 24 May 2010 1 June 2014
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 512 Watt 1 Watt

A6-7000 has a 119.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 51100% lower power consumption.

The AMD A6-7000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron M U3400 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M U3400
Celeron M U3400
AMD A6-7000
A6-7000

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 4 votes

Rate Celeron M U3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 14 votes

Rate A6-7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron M U3400 and A6-7000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.