Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.29
+3.6%
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
2003
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.28

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 outperforms Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31293135
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreMobile Athlon 64
Power efficiency2.760.76
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Oakville (2003−2004)
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)August 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$134no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz800 MHz
L1 cacheno data128K
L2 cache1 MB512K
Chip lithography45 nmno data
Die size107 mm2193 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA956754
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 0.29
+3.6%
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ 0.28

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 458
+1.8%
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ 450

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.29 0.28
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 has a 3.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 250% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 8 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 or Mobile Athlon 64 3000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.