Solo T1400 vs Mobile Sempron 3100+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Mobile Sempron 3100+
1 core / 1 thread, 62 Watt
0.17
+6.3%
Core Solo T1400
2006
1 core / 1 thread, 27 Watt
0.16

Mobile Sempron 3100+ outperforms Core Solo T1400 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Sempron 3100+ and Core Solo T1400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32723297
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesMobile SempronCore Solo
Power efficiency0.260.56
Architecture codenameGeorgetownYonah (2005−2006)
Release dateno dataJanuary 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Sempron 3100+ and Core Solo T1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speedno data1.83 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz1.83 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz667 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithographyno data65 nm
Die sizeno data90 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data151 million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.1625V - 1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Sempron 3100+ and Core Solo T1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataPPGA478, PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron 3100+ and Core Solo T1400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Mobile Sempron 3100+ and Core Solo T1400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Sempron 3100+ and Core Solo T1400 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Sempron 3100+ and Core Solo T1400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Mobile Sempron 3100+ 0.17
+6.3%
Solo T1400 0.16

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Sempron 3100+ 277
+9.5%
Solo T1400 253

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Mobile Sempron 3100+ 95
Solo T1400 95

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 0.16
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 27 Watt

Mobile Sempron 3100+ has a 6.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Solo T1400, on the other hand, has 129.6% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Mobile Sempron 3100+ and Core Solo T1400.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron 3100+ and Core Solo T1400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Sempron 3100+
Mobile Sempron 3100+
Intel Core Solo T1400
Core Solo T1400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Mobile Sempron 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 5 votes

Rate Core Solo T1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Sempron 3100+ or Core Solo T1400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.