UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

Place in the ranking	826	642
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	25.09	no data
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)	Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code name	Lakefield GT2	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	28 May 2020 (4 years ago)	11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	64	32
Core clock speed	200 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	500 MHz	1450 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	7 Watt	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR4	no data
Shared memory	+	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

12_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) 2.52

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 4.72
+87.3%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) 1792

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 3168
+76.8%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) 1296

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 2495
+92.6%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) 8409

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 15716
+86.9%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) 87818

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 112966
+28.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	13 −30.8%	17 +30.8%
1440p	12−14 −108%	25 +108%
4K	6−7 −100%	12 +100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−100%

10
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −62.5%	12−14 +62.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	11
Battlefield 5	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −85.7%	12−14 +85.7%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −142%	27−30 +142%
Hitman 3	7−8 −42.9%	10 +42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −55%	30−35 +55%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −1000%	22 +1000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −150%	15 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −54.5%	16−18 +54.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −27%	47 +27%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −62.5%	12−14 +62.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	9
Battlefield 5	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −85.7%	12−14 +85.7%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −142%	27−30 +142%
Hitman 3	7−8 −28.6%	9 +28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −55%	30−35 +55%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −700%	16 +700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −54.5%	17 +54.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −30.8%	16−18 +30.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −16.2%	43 +16.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −62.5%	12−14 +62.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	5−6
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −142%	27−30 +142%
Hitman 3	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +100%	10 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −45.5%	16 +45.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +62.5%	8 −62.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −21.6%	45−50 +21.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−100%

12−14
+100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Hitman 3	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −57.1%	10−12 +57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −100%	30−33 +100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−50%

9−10
+50%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−25%

5−6
+25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Metro Exodus	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

This is how UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) and UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 31% faster in 1080p
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 108% faster in 1440p
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is 100% faster.
in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 1000% faster.

All in all, in popular games: