Radeon 625 vs UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

Place in the ranking	761	804
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	8.69	3.89
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code name	Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11	Polaris 24
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	28 May 2019 (5 years ago)	13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	384
Core clock speed	300 MHz	730 MHz
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	1024 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12-25 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	24.58
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	8
TMUs	no data	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR4	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	no data	2 GB
Memory bus width	no data	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	no data	6.3
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.0
Vulkan	-	1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	13 +30%	10−12 −30%
4K	9 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	12 −16.7%	14−16 +16.7%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Metro Exodus	8 +60%	5−6 −60%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Valorant	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Dota 2	12 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%
Far Cry 5	13 −30.8%	16−18 +30.8%
Fortnite	18−20 +20%	14−16 −20%
Forza Horizon 4	11 −27.3%	14−16 +27.3%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Grand Theft Auto V	7 +0%	7−8 +0%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	32 +23.1%	24−27 −23.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Valorant	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
World of Tanks	30 −70%	50−55 +70%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Dota 2	20 +186%	7−8 −186%
Far Cry 5	12 −41.7%	16−18 +41.7%
Forza Horizon 4	13 −7.7%	14−16 +7.7%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 +11.5%	24−27 −11.5%
Valorant	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Grand Theft Auto V	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 +10.5%	18−20 −10.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
World of Tanks	21−24 +15.8%	18−20 −15.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Forza Horizon 5	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Valorant	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	9 −77.8%	16−18 +77.8%
Far Cry 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Fortnite	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Valorant	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

This is how UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and Radeon 625 compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 30% faster in 1080p
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 13% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 186% faster.
in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 625 is 78% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is ahead in 29 tests (49%)
Radeon 625 is ahead in 8 tests (14%)
there's a draw in 22 tests (37%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.04	2.72
Chip lithography	10 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12 Watt	50 Watt

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) has a 11.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 625 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.