Radeon 625 vs UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

Place in performance ranking	729	758
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	no data	0.45
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code name	Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11	Polaris 24
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	28 May 2019 (4 years ago)	12 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price	no data	$68

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	384
Core clock speed	300 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	1024 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12-25 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	24.58

Size and compatibility

Information on UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and Radeon 625 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR4	DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	no data	4 GB
Memory bus width	no data	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	no data	6.3
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.0
Vulkan	no data	1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	13 +30%	10−12 −30%
4K	9 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6−7
+20%

5−6

−20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8 +100%	4−5 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	8 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Far Cry New Dawn	8 +100%	4−5 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Hitman 3	8 +60%	5−6 −60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Hitman 3	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Metro Exodus	2 −100%	4−5 +100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5 −40%	7−8 +40%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Hitman 3	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Hitman 3	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

This is how UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and Radeon 625 compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 30% faster than Radeon 625 in 1080p
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 12.5% faster than Radeon 625 in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 100% faster than the Radeon 625.
in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 625 is 100% faster than the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU).

All in all, in popular games: