Iris Plus Graphics vs UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) with Iris Plus Graphics, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
2019
12 Watt
3.13

Iris Plus Graphics outperforms UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking748644
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.7321.84
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameIce Lake G1 Gen. 11Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 May 2019 (5 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32512
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-25 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data32.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.024 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
OpenGLno data4.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
4K9
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8
−50%
12−14
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10
−40%
14−16
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Hitman 3 6
−50%
9−10
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Metro Exodus 12
−50%
18−20
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6
−50%
9−10
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−41%
55−60
+41%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Hitman 3 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−41%
55−60
+41%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Hitman 3 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 13
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
−40%
7−8
+40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−41%
55−60
+41%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Hitman 3 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

This is how UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and Iris Plus Graphics compete in popular games:

  • Iris Plus Graphics is 38% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Plus Graphics is 33% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.13 4.70
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) has 25% lower power consumption.

Iris Plus Graphics, on the other hand, has a 50.2% higher aggregate performance score.

The Iris Plus Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is a notebook card while Iris Plus Graphics is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics
Iris Plus Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 364 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 361 vote

Rate Iris Plus Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.