UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs Radeon 630

Place in performance ranking	699	729
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	0.50	no data
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	Lexa	Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	12 August 2019 (4 years ago)	28 May 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price	$65	no data

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	32
Core clock speed	no data	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz	1100 MHz
Number of transistors	2,200 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate	38.98	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon 630 and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	no data
Memory bus width	64 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	no data
HDMI	+	no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12_1
OpenGL	4.6	no data
Vulkan	+	no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	14−16 +7.7%	13 −7.7%
4K	9−10 +0%	9 +0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6−7

+0%

6−7

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −60%	8 +60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Battlefield 5	8−9 +0%	8 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −60%	8 +60%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Hitman 3	7−8 −14.3%	8 +14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +0%	7 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +42.9%	7 −42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Battlefield 5	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Hitman 3	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +150%	2 −150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −42.9%	10 +42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Battlefield 5	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +40%	5 −40%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Hitman 3	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Hitman 3	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

This is how Radeon 630 and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compete in popular games:

Radeon 630 is 7.7% faster than UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) in 1080p
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 0% faster than Radeon 630 in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 630 is 150% faster than the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU).
in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 60% faster than the Radeon 630.

All in all, in popular games: