Tesla C2075: specs and benchmarks
Aggregate performance score
Tesla C2075 provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 8.73% of a leader's which is GeForce RTX 4090.
Summary
NVIDIA started Tesla C2075 sales 25 July 2011. This is a Fermi 2.0 architecture desktop card based on 40 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 6 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 0.78 GHz are supplied, and together with 384 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 150.3 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is a dual-slot graphics card attached via PCIe 2.0 x16 interface. Its manufacturer default version has a length of 248 mm. One 6-pin and one 8-pin connectors are required, and power consumption is at 247 Watt.
Primary details
Some basic facts about Tesla C2075: architecture, market segment, release date etc.
| Place in the ranking | 492 | |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | |
| Power efficiency | 2.42 | of 100.00 (Radeon 890M) |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | |
| GPU code name | GF110 | |
| Market segment | Workstation | |
| Release date | 25 July 2011 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Tesla C2075's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Tesla C2075's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 448 | of 21760 (GeForce RTX 5090) |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | of 2670 MHz (Arc B580) |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | of 208,000 million (B200 SXM 192 GB) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | of 3 nm (Arc Graphics 140V) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 247 Watt | of 2400 Watt (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem) |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | of 2,554 (Radeon Instinct MI300X) |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.028 TFLOPS | of 109.7 (GeForce RTX 5090) |
| ROPs | 48 | of 192 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) |
| TMUs | 56 | of 1280 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT) |
Form factor & compatibility
This section provides details about the physical dimensions of Tesla C2075 and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Width | 2-slot | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of memory installed on Tesla C2075: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | of 294912 (Radeon Instinct MI325X) |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | of 8192 Bit (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory clock speed | 783 MHz | of 20000 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) |
| Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | of 5,171 GB/s (Radeon Instinct MI300X) |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on Tesla C2075. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI |
API compatibility
APIs supported by Tesla C2075, sometimes including their particular versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 |
Benchmark performance
Synthetic benchmark performance of Tesla C2075. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Octane Render OctaneBench
This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.
Send your test results of Tesla C2075.
AMD equivalent
According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Tesla C2075 is Radeon Pro WX 4100, which is faster by 8% and higher by 21 positions in our ranking.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Tesla C2075:
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with Tesla C2075 according to our statistics.
