GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Tesla C2075

Place in performance ranking	461	655
Place by popularity	not in top-100	71
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.39	0.29
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	GF110	GF116
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	25 July 2011 (12 years ago)	15 March 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$149
Current price	$2237	$197 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Tesla C2075 has 34% better value for money than GTX 550 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	448	192
CUDA cores	no data	192
Core clock speed	574 MHz	900 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	247 Watt	116 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	100 °C
Texture fill rate	32.14	28.8 billion/sec
Floating-point performance	1,030.4 gflops	691.2 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	no data	16x PCI-E 2.0
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	248 mm	8.25" (21 cm)
Height	no data	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	One 6-pin
SLI options	no data	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	3132 MHz	4.1 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	150.3 GB/s	98.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI	Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDMI	no data	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.2
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	2.0	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla C2075 8.71
+117%

GTX 550 Ti 4.02

Tesla C2075 outperforms GeForce GTX 550 Ti by 117% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Tesla C2075 3364
+117%

GTX 550 Ti 1552

Tesla C2075 outperforms GeForce GTX 550 Ti by 117% in Passmark.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Tesla C2075 41
+105%

GTX 550 Ti 20

Tesla C2075 outperforms GeForce GTX 550 Ti by 105% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	80−85 +111%	38 −111%
Full HD	65−70 +103%	32 −103%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

7−8
+133%

3−4

−133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	0−1
Battlefield 5	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +125%	8−9 −125%
Hitman 3	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +120%	10−11 −120%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +138%	8−9 −138%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	0−1
Battlefield 5	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +125%	8−9 −125%
Hitman 3	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +120%	10−11 −120%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +138%	8−9 −138%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +125%	8−9 −125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +120%	10−11 −120%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +138%	8−9 −138%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

+150%

4−5
−150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Far Cry 5	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Hitman 3	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2	0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
+167%

3−4

−167%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Hitman 3	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	2−3	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2	0−1