NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs Tesla C2075

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
NVIDIA Tesla C2075

General info

Comparison of Quadro M4000M and Tesla C2075 architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
 
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
 
Fermi
Code name
GM204
 
GF110
Type
Mobile workstation
 
Workstation
Release date
18 August 2015
 
25 July 2011

Technical specs

Quadro M4000M and Tesla C2075's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro M4000M and Tesla C2075's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines
1,280
 
448
Core clock speed
975 MHz
 
575 MHz
Boost Clock
1013 MHz
 
n/d
Transistor count
5,200 million
 
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
 
247 Watt
Texture fill rate
78.00
 
32.2
Floating-point performance
2,496 gflops
 
1,030.4 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro M4000M and Tesla C2075 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size
large
 
n/d
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
 
PCIe 2.0 x16
Length
n/d
 
248 mm
Supplementary power connectors
None
 
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory specs

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M4000M and Tesla C2075: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
GDDR5
 
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
 
6 GB
Memory bus width
256 Bit
 
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
 
3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
 
144.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
 
n/d

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M4000M and Tesla C2075.
Display Connectors
No outputs
 
1x DVI
Display Port
1.2
 
n/d

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and Tesla C2075. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision Pro
+
 
n/d
Mosaic
+
 
n/d
nView Display Management
+
 
n/d
Optimus
+
 
n/d
CUDA
-
 
2.0

API support

APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and Tesla C2075, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX
12
 
11.0
Shader Model
5.0
 
n/d
OpenGL
4.5
 
4.5
Vulkan
+
 
-

Video card benchmarks performance comparison

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro M4000M and Tesla C2075. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
24.91 +108.3%
 
11.96 −108.3%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
49204
 
n/d
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6937
 
n/d
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
7723
 
n/d
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
10259
 
n/d
Passmark
4567
 
n/d
Octane Render OctaneBench
53 +29.3%
 
41 −29.3%

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro M4000M and Tesla C2075. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
251 Mh/s +167%
 
94 Mh/s −167%

Game benchmarks comparison (in FPS)

Let's see how good Quadro M4000M and Tesla C2075 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS, while overall gaming performance is a number in 0-100 range, and the older the game, the less impact it has on the overall grade.
Overall gaming performance
0.43
 
n/d
Games benchmarked by notebookcheck.net
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
medium / 768p
90
 
n/d
high / 1080p
55
 
n/d
ultra / 1080p
48
 
n/d
4k / 2160p
20
 
n/d

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

108.3% faster (about 2 times) in synthetic tests
Much newer (18 August 2015 vs 25 July 2011)
Higher memory bandwidth (160 vs 144 GB/s)
Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 40 nm)
Less power hungry (100 vs 247 watts)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)

Advantages of NVIDIA Tesla C2075

Wider memory bus (384 vs 256 bit)
More pipelines (448 vs 1)

So, Quadro M4000M or Tesla C2075?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro M4000M.

Be aware that Quadro M4000M is a mobile workstation card while Tesla C2075 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro M4000M and Tesla C2075, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
NVIDIA Tesla C2075
Like
Like

Choose a GPU

Compare GPUs

Comparisons

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Quadro M4000M or Tesla C2075, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.