Radeon RX Vega 7 vs TITAN RTX

Place in performance ranking	55	501
Place by popularity	not in top-100	10
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	11.32	10.96
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code name	TU102	Vega Raven Ridge
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	18 December 2018 (5 years ago)	7 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,499	no data
Current price	$1035 (0.4x MSRP)	$387

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

TITAN RTX has 3% better value for money than RX Vega 7.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4608	448
Core clock speed	1350 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz	1800 MHz
Number of transistors	18,600 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	280 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	509.8	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on TITAN RTX and Radeon RX Vega 7 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	no data
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	no data
Memory bus width	384 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	672.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	no data
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12_1
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	no data
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN RTX 48.80
+557%

RX Vega 7 7.43

TITAN RTX outperforms Radeon RX Vega 7 by 557% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

TITAN RTX 49596
+845%

RX Vega 7 5249

TITAN RTX outperforms Radeon RX Vega 7 by 845% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

TITAN RTX 99561
+462%

RX Vega 7 17714

TITAN RTX outperforms Radeon RX Vega 7 by 462% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

TITAN RTX 35821
+970%

RX Vega 7 3348

TITAN RTX outperforms Radeon RX Vega 7 by 970% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

TITAN RTX 177477
+618%

RX Vega 7 24726

TITAN RTX outperforms Radeon RX Vega 7 by 618% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

TITAN RTX 534822
+175%

RX Vega 7 194758

TITAN RTX outperforms Radeon RX Vega 7 by 175% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	160 +596%	23 −596%
1440p	103 +164%	39 −164%
4K	79 +365%	17 −365%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

79
+339%

−339%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	104 +395%	21 −395%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	104 +447%	19 −447%
Battlefield 5	209 +850%	21−24 −850%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	143 +741%	17 −741%
Cyberpunk 2077	79 +464%	14 −464%
Far Cry 5	127 +647%	17 −647%
Far Cry New Dawn	201 +905%	20−22 −905%
Forza Horizon 4	187 +405%	37 −405%
Hitman 3	222 +957%	21 −957%
Horizon Zero Dawn	332 +710%	41 −710%
Metro Exodus	144 +433%	27 −433%
Red Dead Redemption 2	127 +370%	27 −370%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	351 +1110%	29 −1110%
Watch Dogs: Legion	112 +559%	17 −559%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	95 +459%	17 −459%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	88 +487%	15 −487%
Battlefield 5	203 +823%	21−24 −823%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	190 +956%	18 −956%
Cyberpunk 2077	79 +690%	10 −690%
Far Cry 5	104 +271%	28 −271%
Far Cry New Dawn	140 +1300%	10 −1300%
Forza Horizon 4	186 +431%	35 −431%
Hitman 3	94 +1243%	7 −1243%
Horizon Zero Dawn	307 +890%	31 −890%
Metro Exodus	129 +545%	20 −545%
Red Dead Redemption 2	126 +530%	20 −530%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	223 +1074%	19 −1074%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	267 +1305%	19 −1305%
Watch Dogs: Legion	97 +547%	15 −547%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	79 +427%	14−16 −427%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	80 +789%	9−10 −789%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	102 +538%	16−18 −538%
Cyberpunk 2077	78 +767%	9 −767%
Far Cry 5	79 +243%	21−24 −243%
Forza Horizon 4	175 +548%	27 −548%
Horizon Zero Dawn	218 +891%	22 −891%
Metro Exodus	117 +550%	18 −550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	139 +969%	13 −969%
Watch Dogs: Legion	86 +617%	12−14 −617%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

123
+583%

−583%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +600%	14−16 −600%
Far Cry New Dawn	144 +1209%	10−12 −1209%
Hitman 3	64 +611%	9−10 −611%
Red Dead Redemption 2	63 +1160%	5−6 −1160%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 +783%	6−7 −783%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	66 +3200%	2−3 −3200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	122 +1256%	9−10 −1256%
Cyberpunk 2077	66 +2100%	3−4 −2100%
Far Cry 5	134 +1017%	12−14 −1017%
Forza Horizon 4	157 +1108%	12−14 −1108%
Horizon Zero Dawn	168 +950%	16−18 −950%
Metro Exodus	114 +1325%	8−9 −1325%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	183 +2950%	6−7 −2950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +986%	7−8 −986%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70 +1650%	4−5 −1650%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	90 +275%	24 −275%
Far Cry New Dawn	121 +2320%	5−6 −2320%
Hitman 3	48 +1100%	4−5 −1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +725%	8−9 −725%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	66 +2100%	3−4 −2100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	103 +2475%	4−5 −2475%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	52 +1200%	4−5 −1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	43 +1333%	3−4 −1333%
Battlefield 5	97 +2325%	4−5 −2325%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	79 +1875%	4−5 −1875%
Cyberpunk 2077	33 +3200%	1−2 −3200%
Forza Horizon 4	114 +1325%	8−9 −1325%
Horizon Zero Dawn	102 +1175%	8−9 −1175%
Metro Exodus	82 +925%	8−9 −925%
Watch Dogs: Legion	43 +2050%	2−3 −2050%