Radeon 780M vs T1200 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared T1200 Mobile with Radeon 780M, including specs and performance data.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 95 Watt
20.20
+10.3%

T1200 Mobile outperforms 780M by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking272302
Place by popularitynot in top-10049
Power efficiency14.5883.73
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameno dataPhoenix
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024768
Core clock speed855 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHz2700 MHz
Number of transistorsno data25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data129.6
Floating-point processing powerno data8.294 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data48
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed10000 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1200 Mobile 20.20
+10.3%
Radeon 780M 18.32

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T1200 Mobile 7784
+10.3%
Radeon 780M 7060

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T1200 Mobile 14387
+12.5%
Radeon 780M 12785

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

T1200 Mobile 44135
+6%
Radeon 780M 41622

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T1200 Mobile 10134
+26.9%
Radeon 780M 7987

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

T1200 Mobile 50827
+5.6%
Radeon 780M 48112

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

T1200 Mobile 3595
+27.4%
Radeon 780M 2822

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
+63.9%
36
−63.9%
1440p34
+70%
20
−70%
4K109
+738%
13
−738%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−21.9%
39
+21.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+7.3%
40−45
−7.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 47
+56.7%
30−33
−56.7%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+8.1%
35−40
−8.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+3.2%
31
−3.2%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+7%
40−45
−7%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+8.2%
45−50
−8.2%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+7%
110−120
−7%
Hitman 3 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+6.7%
90−95
−6.7%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+9.5%
60−65
−9.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+8.2%
45−50
−8.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+10%
60−65
−10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+4.6%
85−90
−4.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+7.3%
40−45
−7.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 28
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+8.1%
35−40
−8.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+33.3%
24
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+7%
40−45
−7%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+8.2%
45−50
−8.2%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+7%
110−120
−7%
Hitman 3 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+6.7%
90−95
−6.7%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+9.5%
60−65
−9.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+8.2%
45−50
−8.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 73
+35.2%
54
−35.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+7.1%
40−45
−7.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+4.6%
85−90
−4.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+7.3%
40−45
−7.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+8.1%
35−40
−8.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+39.1%
23
−39.1%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+7%
40−45
−7%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+7%
110−120
−7%
Hitman 3 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 63
+18.9%
53
−18.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 63
+37%
46
−37%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+27.6%
29
−27.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 19
+5.6%
18
−5.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+8.2%
45−50
−8.2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+7.1%
27−30
−7.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+10%
20−22
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+11%
100−105
−11%
Hitman 3 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45
+21.6%
35−40
−21.6%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+8.8%
30−35
−8.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 47
+46.9%
32
−46.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+15%
20
−15%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+7.3%
110−120
−7.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Hitman 3 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+9.6%
90−95
−9.6%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+10.5%
18−20
−10.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+33.3%
15
−33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+8%
24−27
−8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+29.4%
17
−29.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%

This is how T1200 Mobile and Radeon 780M compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 64% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 70% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 738% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 57% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 780M is 43% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is ahead in 68 tests (94%)
  • Radeon 780M is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.20 18.32
Recency 12 April 2021 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 10.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 780M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 200% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

The T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 780M in performance tests.

Be aware that T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 780M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T1200 Mobile
T1200 Mobile
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 4 votes

Rate T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1547 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.