GeForce RTX 3080 vs Radeon RX Vega 56

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

We've compared desktop GPUs Radeon RX Vega 56 and GeForce RTX 3080, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 56
2017
8 GB HBM2
34.31

GeForce RTX 3080 outperforms Radeon RX Vega 56 by an impressive 91% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking14523
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation26.8223.50
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameVegaAmpere GA102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 August 2017 (6 years ago)16 September 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $699
Current price$224 (0.6x MSRP)$823 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX Vega 56 has 14% better value for money than RTX 3080.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35848704
Core clock speed1138 MHz1450 MHz
Boost clock speed1474 MHz1710 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt320 Watt
Texture fill rate329.5465.1
Floating-point performance10,566 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm285 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount8 GB10 GB
Memory bus width409.6 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz19000 MHz
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/s760.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.2
CUDAno data8.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 56 34.31
RTX 3080 65.40
+90.6%

GeForce RTX 3080 outperforms Radeon RX Vega 56 by 91% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX Vega 56 13277
RTX 3080 25308
+90.6%

GeForce RTX 3080 outperforms Radeon RX Vega 56 by 91% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX Vega 56 54586
RTX 3080 91747
+68.1%

GeForce RTX 3080 outperforms Radeon RX Vega 56 by 68% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX Vega 56 29086
RTX 3080 53713
+84.7%

GeForce RTX 3080 outperforms Radeon RX Vega 56 by 85% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX Vega 56 20759
RTX 3080 39257
+89.1%

GeForce RTX 3080 outperforms Radeon RX Vega 56 by 89% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX Vega 56 125359
RTX 3080 188064
+50%

GeForce RTX 3080 outperforms Radeon RX Vega 56 by 50% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

RX Vega 56 412820
RTX 3080 529548
+28.3%

GeForce RTX 3080 outperforms Radeon RX Vega 56 by 28% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD116
−41.4%
164
+41.4%
1440p77
−58.4%
122
+58.4%
4K48
−77.1%
85
+77.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
−115%
120−130
+115%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 77
−31.2%
100−110
+31.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−85%
111
+85%
Battlefield 5 151
−13.9%
172
+13.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
−79.6%
160−170
+79.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
−134%
138
+134%
Far Cry 5 98
−60.2%
157
+60.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 96
−34.4%
129
+34.4%
Forza Horizon 4 141
−29.8%
180−190
+29.8%
Hitman 3 100−110
−59.3%
172
+59.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−124%
166
+124%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−176%
152
+176%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 105
−84.8%
194
+84.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−109%
134
+109%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70
−44.3%
100−110
+44.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−60%
96
+60%
Battlefield 5 140
−11.4%
156
+11.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
−79.6%
160−170
+79.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
−127%
134
+127%
Far Cry 5 93
−61.3%
150
+61.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 93
−33.3%
124
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 134
−36.6%
180−190
+36.6%
Hitman 3 100−110
−54.6%
167
+54.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−101%
149
+101%
Metro Exodus 70
−82.9%
128
+82.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−116%
119
+116%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 91
−105%
187
+105%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 124
−144%
303
+144%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−85.9%
119
+85.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 52
−94.2%
100−110
+94.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−46.7%
88
+46.7%
Battlefield 5 131
−10.7%
145
+10.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
−122%
131
+122%
Far Cry 5 89
−57.3%
140
+57.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 84
−33.3%
112
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 109
−67.9%
180−190
+67.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
−101%
149
+101%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−57.8%
101
+57.8%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
−111%
110−120
+111%
Hitman 3 60−65
−165%
164
+165%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−179%
131
+179%
Metro Exodus 42
−126%
95
+126%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−211%
84
+211%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 58
−159%
150
+159%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 44
−63.6%
70−75
+63.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−105%
76
+105%
Battlefield 5 99
−25.3%
124
+25.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−231%
86
+231%
Far Cry 5 74
−82.4%
135
+82.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 74
−44.6%
107
+44.6%
Forza Horizon 4 88
−70.5%
150−160
+70.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−157%
110−120
+157%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−179%
81
+179%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
−140%
70−75
+140%
Hitman 3 30−35
−221%
109
+221%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−76%
44
+76%
Metro Exodus 27
−141%
65
+141%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−211%
56
+211%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 31
−177%
86
+177%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
−161%
115
+161%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27
−88.9%
50−55
+88.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−148%
52
+148%
Battlefield 5 55
−65.5%
91
+65.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−291%
43
+291%
Far Cry 5 39
−141%
94
+141%
Far Cry New Dawn 42
−112%
89
+112%
Forza Horizon 4 59
−79.7%
100−110
+79.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−218%
54
+218%

This is how RX Vega 56 and RTX 3080 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 is 41% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3080 is 58% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3080 is 77% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3080 is 291% faster than the RX Vega 56.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3080 surpassed RX Vega 56 in all 68 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.31 65.40
Recency 14 August 2017 16 September 2020
Cost $399 $699
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 10 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 320 Watt

The GeForce RTX 3080 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 56 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Radeon RX Vega 56
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 692 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 5162 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.