GeForce 320M vs Radeon RX Vega 56

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 56 with GeForce 320M, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 56
2017
8 GB HBM2, 210 Watt
34.33
+6257%

RX Vega 56 outperforms GeForce 320M by a whopping 6257% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1411183
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation26.61no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)GT2xx (2009−2012)
GPU code nameVegaMCP89
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 August 2017 (6 years ago)1 April 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data
Current price$224 (0.6x MSRP)$408

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX Vega 56 and GeForce 320M have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores358432
Core clock speed1138 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1474 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate329.57.200
Floating-point performance10,566 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega 56 and GeForce 320M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width409.6 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.1.125N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 56 34.33
+6257%
GeForce 320M 0.54

Radeon RX Vega 56 outperforms GeForce 320M by 6257% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX Vega 56 13258
+6244%
GeForce 320M 209

Radeon RX Vega 56 outperforms GeForce 320M by 6244% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX Vega 56 54586
+2847%
GeForce 320M 1852

Radeon RX Vega 56 outperforms GeForce 320M by 2847% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD115
+858%
12
−858%
1440p70
+6900%
1−2
−6900%
4K510−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 190−200
+6233%
3−4
−6233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3750−3800
+6256%
55−60
−6256%
Battlefield 5 10400−10450
+6241%
164
−6241%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 190−200
+6233%
3−4
−6233%
Cyberpunk 2077 190−200
+6233%
3−4
−6233%
Far Cry 5 7300−7350
+6248%
115
−6248%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+5900%
1−2
−5900%
Forza Horizon 4 8950−9000
+6248%
141
−6248%
Hitman 3 120−130
+5900%
2−3
−5900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 750−800
+6150%
12−14
−6150%
Metro Exodus 9150−9200
+6254%
144
−6254%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5450−5500
+6237%
85−90
−6237%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 400−450
+5614%
7−8
−5614%
Watch Dogs: Legion 550−600
+6011%
9−10
−6011%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3750−3800
+6256%
55−60
−6256%
Battlefield 5 9700−9750
+6240%
153
−6240%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 190−200
+6233%
3−4
−6233%
Cyberpunk 2077 190−200
+6233%
3−4
−6233%
Far Cry 5 5800−5850
+6204%
92
−6204%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+5900%
1−2
−5900%
Forza Horizon 4 17250−17300
+6242%
272
−6242%
Hitman 3 120−130
+5900%
2−3
−5900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 750−800
+6150%
12−14
−6150%
Metro Exodus 6700−6750
+6221%
106
−6221%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5450−5500
+6237%
85−90
−6237%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 400−450
+5614%
7−8
−5614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 190−200
+6233%
3−4
−6233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 550−600
+6011%
9−10
−6011%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3750−3800
+6256%
55−60
−6256%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 190−200
+6233%
3−4
−6233%
Cyberpunk 2077 190−200
+6233%
3−4
−6233%
Far Cry 5 4350−4400
+6204%
69
−6204%
Forza Horizon 4 6900−6950
+6230%
109
−6230%
Horizon Zero Dawn 750−800
+6150%
12−14
−6150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 400−450
+5614%
7−8
−5614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 190−200
+6233%
3−4
−6233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 550−600
+6011%
9−10
−6011%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5450−5500
+6237%
85−90
−6237%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6200−6250
+6227%
98
−6227%
Far Cry New Dawn 5300−5350
+6210%
84
−6210%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2750−2800
+6150%
44
−6150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2350−2400
+6251%
35−40
−6251%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 250−260
+6150%
4−5
−6150%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+5900%
1−2
−5900%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+5900%
1−2
−5900%
Forza Horizon 4 5550−5600
+6207%
88
−6207%
Hitman 3 350−400
+5733%
6−7
−5733%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+6233%
3−4
−6233%
Metro Exodus 4700−4750
+6251%
74
−6251%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5100−5150
+6196%
80−85
−6196%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2950−3000
+6177%
45−50
−6177%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1800−1850
+6107%
27−30
−6107%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 190−200
+6233%
3−4
−6233%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2900−2950
+6204%
46
−6204%
Far Cry New Dawn 2000−2050
+6150%
32
−6150%
Hitman 3 1750−1800
+6150%
27−30
−6150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1950−2000
+6190%
31
−6190%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2750−2800
+6150%
44
−6150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+5900%
1−2
−5900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1300−1350
+6090%
21−24
−6090%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1300−1350
+6090%
21−24
−6090%
Cyberpunk 2077 600−650
+5900%
10−11
−5900%
Far Cry 5 1450−1500
+6204%
23
−6204%
Forza Horizon 4 3750−3800
+6256%
59
−6256%
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 250−260
+6150%
4−5
−6150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1050−1100
+6076%
16−18
−6076%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+5900%
2−3
−5900%

This is how RX Vega 56 and GeForce 320M compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 56 is 858% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega 56 is 6900% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.33 0.54
Recency 14 August 2017 1 April 2010
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 23 Watt

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 320M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 56 is a desktop card while GeForce 320M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Radeon RX Vega 56
NVIDIA GeForce 320M
GeForce 320M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 704 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 50 votes

Rate GeForce 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.