GeForce 320M: specs and benchmarks
Aggregated performance score
It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 0.54% of a leader's which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
Summary
NVIDIA started GeForce 320M sales 1 April 2010. This is a GT2xx architecture notebook card based on 40 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at office use.
Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via PCIe 2.0 x16 interface. Power consumption is at 23 Watt.
General info
Some basic facts about GeForce 320M: architecture, market segment, release date etc.
Place in performance ranking | 1177 | |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | |
Architecture | GT2xx (2009−2012) | |
GPU code name | MCP89 | |
Market segment | Laptop | |
Release date | 1 April 2010 (14 years old) | |
Current price | $408 | of 168889 (A100 PCIe 80 GB) |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Technical specs
GeForce 320M's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce 320M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 32 | of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT) |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) |
Number of transistors | 486 million | of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile) |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | of 4 (Radeon 780M) |
Power consumption (TDP) | 23 Watt | of 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem) |
Texture fill rate | 7.200 | of 969.9 (H100 SXM5 96 GB) |
Size and compatibility
Information on GeForce 320M's compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed on GeForce 320M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.
Memory type | System Shared | |
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | of 192 (Radeon Instinct MI300X) |
Memory bus width | System Shared | of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | of 23000 (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER) |
Shared memory | + |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce 320M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.
Display Connectors | No outputs |
API support
APIs supported by GeForce 320M, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | of 4.6 (GeForce RTX 4090) |
OpenCL | N/A | |
Vulkan | N/A |
Benchmark performance
Synthetic benchmark performance of GeForce 320M. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Send your test results of GeForce 320M.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good GeForce 320M is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 17 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 8−9 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7 |
Full HD
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 8−9 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | |
Metro Exodus | 1−2 | |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7 | |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4 |
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4 |
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3 | |
Hitman 3 | 3−4 | |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 4−5 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | |
Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2 |
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 1−2 | |
Hitman 3 | 1−2 | |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 7−8 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Far Cry 5 | 3−4 | |
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6 |
AMD equivalent
According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to GeForce 320M is Radeon HD 8250, which is faster by 4% and higher by 8 positions in our ranking.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce 320M:
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with GeForce 320M according to our statistics.