RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 7600M XT

Place in the ranking	150	75
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	88.07
Power efficiency	19.75	44.51
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 33	AD107
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	4 January 2023 (2 years ago)	12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	2816
Core clock speed	1280 MHz	1620 MHz
Boost clock speed	2469 MHz	2130 MHz
Number of transistors	13,300 million	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	316.0	187.4
Floating-point processing power	20.23 TFLOPS	12 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	48
TMUs	128	88
Tensor Cores	no data	88
Ray Tracing Cores	32	22

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7600M XT 33.11

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 43.54
+31.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7600M XT 13231

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17398
+31.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	118 −27.1%	150−160 +27.1%
1440p	57 −22.8%	70−75 +22.8%
4K	33 −21.2%	40−45 +21.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	4.33
1440p	no data	9.27
4K	no data	16.23

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	105 −23.8%	130−140 +23.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 −25%	90−95 +25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 −23.7%	120−130 +23.7%
Counter-Strike 2	96 −25%	120−130 +25%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 −25%	90−95 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	255 −17.6%	300−310 +17.6%
Forza Horizon 5	85−90 −23.6%	110−120 +23.6%
Metro Exodus	109 −28.4%	140−150 +28.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 −28.6%	90−95 +28.6%
Valorant	130−140 −31.4%	180−190 +31.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 −23.7%	120−130 +23.7%
Counter-Strike 2	82 −22%	100−105 +22%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 −25%	90−95 +25%
Dota 2	89 −23.6%	110−120 +23.6%
Far Cry 5	70 −28.6%	90−95 +28.6%
Fortnite	150−160 −27.4%	200−210 +27.4%
Forza Horizon 4	208 −29.8%	270−280 +29.8%
Forza Horizon 5	85−90 −23.6%	110−120 +23.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	132 −28.8%	170−180 +28.8%
Metro Exodus	90 −22.2%	110−120 +22.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	180−190 −27%	240−250 +27%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 −28.6%	90−95 +28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 −26.1%	150−160 +26.1%
Valorant	130−140 −31.4%	180−190 +31.4%
World of Tanks	270−280 −25.9%	350−400 +25.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 −23.7%	120−130 +23.7%
Counter-Strike 2	73 −30.1%	95−100 +30.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 −25%	90−95 +25%
Dota 2	110−120 −26.1%	140−150 +26.1%
Far Cry 5	90−95 −20.9%	110−120 +20.9%
Forza Horizon 4	180 −27.8%	230−240 +27.8%
Forza Horizon 5	85−90 −23.6%	110−120 +23.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	180−190 −27%	240−250 +27%
Valorant	130−140 −31.4%	180−190 +31.4%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −20.7%	35−40 +20.7%
Dota 2	70 −28.6%	90−95 +28.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	69 −30.4%	90−95 +30.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −31.4%	230−240 +31.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −21.2%	40−45 +21.2%
World of Tanks	220−230 −27.3%	280−290 +27.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 −28.8%	85−90 +28.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −21.2%	40−45 +21.2%
Far Cry 5	110−120 −27.3%	140−150 +27.3%
Forza Horizon 4	120 −25%	150−160 +25%
Forza Horizon 5	55−60 −25%	70−75 +25%
Metro Exodus	92 −30.4%	120−130 +30.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	74 −28.4%	95−100 +28.4%
Valorant	100−110 −26.2%	130−140 +26.2%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	74 −28.4%	95−100 +28.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	74 −28.4%	95−100 +28.4%
Metro Exodus	35 −28.6%	45−50 +28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 −28.4%	140−150 +28.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −22.7%	27−30 +22.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	74 −28.4%	95−100 +28.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −28.2%	50−55 +28.2%
Counter-Strike 2	22 −22.7%	27−30 +22.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Dota 2	65−70 −30.8%	85−90 +30.8%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −22.4%	60−65 +22.4%
Fortnite	45−50 −27.7%	60−65 +27.7%
Forza Horizon 4	64 −25%	80−85 +25%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 −29%	40−45 +29%
Valorant	50−55 −22.6%	65−70 +22.6%

This is how RX 7600M XT and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 27% faster in 1080p
RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 23% faster in 1440p
RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 21% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	33.11	43.54
Recency	4 January 2023	12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	70 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a 31.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 71.4% lower power consumption.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7600M XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7600M XT is a notebook card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.