RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 7600M XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7600M XT with RTX 4000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RX 7600M XT
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
33.08

RTX 4000 Ada Generation outperforms RX 7600M XT by an impressive 98% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15928
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 3 (2022−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 33AD104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 January 2023 (1 year ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20486144
Boost clock speed2300 MHz2175 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt (75 - 120 Watt TGP)130 Watt
Texture fill rate320.0417.6
Floating-point processing power20.48 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB20 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed18000 MHz18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s360.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7600M XT 33.08
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 65.35
+97.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7600M XT 12758
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 25206
+97.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120
−91.7%
230−240
+91.7%
1440p62
−93.5%
120−130
+93.5%
4K36
−94.4%
70−75
+94.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−96.1%
100−105
+96.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 131
−90.8%
250−260
+90.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 139
−94.2%
270−280
+94.2%
Battlefield 5 95−100
−93.9%
190−200
+93.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
−93.5%
120−130
+93.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−96.1%
100−105
+96.1%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−91.2%
130−140
+91.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
−94.8%
150−160
+94.8%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
−81.8%
300−310
+81.8%
Hitman 3 60−65
−90.5%
120−130
+90.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
−94%
260−270
+94%
Metro Exodus 144
−94.4%
280−290
+94.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
−97.4%
150−160
+97.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110
−90.5%
200−210
+90.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−93%
220−230
+93%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 237
−89.9%
450−500
+89.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 114
−93%
220−230
+93%
Battlefield 5 95−100
−93.9%
190−200
+93.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
−93.5%
120−130
+93.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−96.1%
100−105
+96.1%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−91.2%
130−140
+91.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
−94.8%
150−160
+94.8%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
−81.8%
300−310
+81.8%
Hitman 3 60−65
−90.5%
120−130
+90.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
−94%
260−270
+94%
Metro Exodus 142
−97.2%
280−290
+97.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
−97.4%
150−160
+97.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 208
−92.3%
400−450
+92.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
−87.5%
120−130
+87.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−93%
220−230
+93%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85
−88.2%
160−170
+88.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 92
−95.7%
180−190
+95.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
−93.5%
120−130
+93.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−96.1%
100−105
+96.1%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−91.2%
130−140
+91.2%
Forza Horizon 4 180
−94.4%
350−400
+94.4%
Hitman 3 60−65
−90.5%
120−130
+90.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140
−92.9%
270−280
+92.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 180
−94.4%
350−400
+94.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
−90%
190−200
+90%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60
−83.3%
110−120
+83.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
−97.4%
150−160
+97.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−93%
110−120
+93%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−95.7%
90−95
+95.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 62
−93.5%
120−130
+93.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 67
−94%
130−140
+94%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−85.7%
65−70
+85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−90.5%
40−45
+90.5%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−85.7%
65−70
+85.7%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
−72.4%
300−310
+72.4%
Hitman 3 35−40
−89.2%
70−75
+89.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 106
−88.7%
200−210
+88.7%
Metro Exodus 92
−95.7%
180−190
+95.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120
−91.7%
230−240
+91.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
−89.2%
140−150
+89.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 160−170
−85.2%
300−310
+85.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−96.1%
100−105
+96.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
−83.3%
55−60
+83.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
Hitman 3 24−27
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
−92.1%
290−300
+92.1%
Metro Exodus 99
−91.9%
190−200
+91.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
−92.3%
100−105
+92.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 32
−87.5%
60−65
+87.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30
−83.3%
55−60
+83.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
Forza Horizon 4 90
−88.9%
170−180
+88.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 64
−87.5%
120−130
+87.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 22
−81.8%
40−45
+81.8%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−92.3%
50−55
+92.3%

This is how RX 7600M XT and RTX 4000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 92% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 94% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 94% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.08 65.35
Recency 5 January 2023 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 130 Watt

RX 7600M XT has 8.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 97.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7600M XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7600M XT is a notebook card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 61 vote

Rate Radeon RX 7600M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 34 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.