RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 7600M XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

RX 7600M XT
2023
8 GB GDDR6
30.34

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms Radeon RX 7600M XT by an impressive 80% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking17038
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 3Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameNavi 33AD104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 January 2023 (1 year ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20486144
Boost clock speed2300 MHz1565 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt (75 - 120 Watt TGP)70 Watt
Texture fill rate320.0300.5

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 7600M XT and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB20 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed18000 MHz14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s280.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDAno data8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7600M XT 30.34
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 54.65
+80.1%

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms Radeon RX 7600M XT by 80% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 7600M XT 11741
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 21150
+80.1%

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms Radeon RX 7600M XT by 80% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD118
−78%
210−220
+78%
1440p62
−77.4%
110−120
+77.4%
4K33
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−76.5%
90−95
+76.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 125
−76%
220−230
+76%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 143
−74.8%
250−260
+74.8%
Battlefield 5 90−95
−70.2%
160−170
+70.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
−72.8%
140−150
+72.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−76.5%
90−95
+76.5%
Far Cry 5 125
−76%
220−230
+76%
Far Cry New Dawn 108
−75.9%
190−200
+75.9%
Forza Horizon 4 237
−68.8%
400−450
+68.8%
Hitman 3 90−95
−70.2%
160−170
+70.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 117
−79.5%
210−220
+79.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−73.5%
85−90
+73.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 153
−76.5%
270−280
+76.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 136
−76.5%
240−250
+76.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 114
−75.4%
200−210
+75.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 116
−72.4%
200−210
+72.4%
Battlefield 5 90−95
−70.2%
160−170
+70.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
−72.8%
140−150
+72.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−76.5%
90−95
+76.5%
Far Cry 5 121
−73.6%
210−220
+73.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 105
−71.4%
180−190
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 233
−71.7%
400−450
+71.7%
Hitman 3 90−95
−70.2%
160−170
+70.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 101
−78.2%
180−190
+78.2%
Metro Exodus 93
−72%
160−170
+72%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−73.5%
85−90
+73.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 126
−74.6%
220−230
+74.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 172
−74.4%
300−310
+74.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 123
−78.9%
220−230
+78.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 79
−77.2%
140−150
+77.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 93
−72%
160−170
+72%
Battlefield 5 90−95
−70.2%
160−170
+70.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−76.5%
90−95
+76.5%
Far Cry 5 112
−78.6%
200−210
+78.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 94
−70.2%
160−170
+70.2%
Forza Horizon 4 174
−72.4%
300−310
+72.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
−80%
180−190
+80%
Watch Dogs: Legion 49
−73.5%
85−90
+73.5%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−77.1%
85−90
+77.1%
Hitman 3 50−55
−79.2%
95−100
+79.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 79
−77.2%
140−150
+77.2%
Metro Exodus 58
−72.4%
100−105
+72.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−73.9%
40−45
+73.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 74
−75.7%
130−140
+75.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60
−66.7%
100−105
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 67
−79.1%
120−130
+79.1%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−66.7%
110−120
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 101
−78.2%
180−190
+78.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 91
−75.8%
160−170
+75.8%
Forza Horizon 4 138
−73.9%
240−250
+73.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
−66.7%
120−130
+66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 34
−76.5%
60−65
+76.5%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−80%
45−50
+80%
Hitman 3 27−30
−72.4%
50−55
+72.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 35
−71.4%
60−65
+71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
−73.1%
90−95
+73.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 29
−72.4%
50−55
+72.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 29
−72.4%
50−55
+72.4%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−75.7%
65−70
+75.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Far Cry 5 50
−80%
90−95
+80%
Far Cry New Dawn 56
−78.6%
100−105
+78.6%
Forza Horizon 4 89
−79.8%
160−170
+79.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 17
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%

This is how RX 7600M XT and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 78% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 77% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 67% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.34 54.65
Recency 5 January 2023 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 70 Watt

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7600M XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7600M XT is a notebook card while RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 50 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 39 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.