RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 7600M XT

Place in the ranking	149	48
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	19.87	53.17
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 33	AD104
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	4 January 2023 (2 years ago)	21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	6144
Core clock speed	1280 MHz	720 MHz
Boost clock speed	2469 MHz	1560 MHz
Number of transistors	13,300 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	316.0	299.5
Floating-point processing power	20.23 TFLOPS	19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	80
TMUs	128	192
Tensor Cores	no data	192
Ray Tracing Cores	32	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	20 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	280.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7600M XT 34.55

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 53.94
+56.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7600M XT 13286

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 20741
+56.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	116 −55.2%	180−190 +55.2%
1440p	55 −54.5%	85−90 +54.5%
4K	33 −51.5%	50−55 +51.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	105 −52.4%	160−170 +52.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 −50.7%	110−120 +50.7%
Elden Ring	135 −55.6%	210−220 +55.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 −54.6%	150−160 +54.6%
Counter-Strike 2	90 −55.6%	140−150 +55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 −50.7%	110−120 +50.7%
Forza Horizon 4	255 −37.3%	350−400 +37.3%
Metro Exodus	109 −56%	170−180 +56%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 −42.9%	100−105 +42.9%
Valorant	130−140 −52.2%	210−220 +52.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 −54.6%	150−160 +54.6%
Counter-Strike 2	82 −46.3%	120−130 +46.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 −50.7%	110−120 +50.7%
Dota 2	89 −46.1%	130−140 +46.1%
Elden Ring	110−120 −51.3%	180−190 +51.3%
Far Cry 5	70 −42.9%	100−105 +42.9%
Fortnite	150−160 −52.9%	240−250 +52.9%
Forza Horizon 4	208 −44.2%	300−310 +44.2%
Grand Theft Auto V	132 −51.5%	200−210 +51.5%
Metro Exodus	90 −55.6%	140−150 +55.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 −52.6%	290−300 +52.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 −42.9%	100−105 +42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 −51.3%	180−190 +51.3%
Valorant	130−140 −52.2%	210−220 +52.2%
World of Tanks	270−280 −43.9%	400−450 +43.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 −54.6%	150−160 +54.6%
Counter-Strike 2	60 −50%	90−95 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 −50.7%	110−120 +50.7%
Dota 2	110−120 −51.8%	170−180 +51.8%
Far Cry 5	90−95 −53.8%	140−150 +53.8%
Forza Horizon 4	180 −55.6%	280−290 +55.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 −52.6%	290−300 +52.6%
Valorant	130−140 −52.2%	210−220 +52.2%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	70 −42.9%	100−105 +42.9%
Elden Ring	65−70 −49.3%	100−105 +49.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	69 −44.9%	100−105 +44.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −54.3%	270−280 +54.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −51.5%	50−55 +51.5%
World of Tanks	220−230 −35.7%	300−310 +35.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 −51.5%	100−105 +51.5%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −51.5%	50−55 +51.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −51.5%	50−55 +51.5%
Far Cry 5	110−120 −54.5%	170−180 +54.5%
Forza Horizon 4	120 −50%	180−190 +50%
Metro Exodus	92 −52.2%	140−150 +52.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	74 −48.6%	110−120 +48.6%
Valorant	100−110 −55.3%	160−170 +55.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	74 −48.6%	110−120 +48.6%
Elden Ring	30−35 −45.2%	45−50 +45.2%
Grand Theft Auto V	74 −48.6%	110−120 +48.6%
Metro Exodus	35 −42.9%	50−55 +42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 −54.5%	170−180 +54.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −36.4%	30−33 +36.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	74 −48.6%	110−120 +48.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −53.8%	60−65 +53.8%
Counter-Strike 2	13 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −50%	21−24 +50%
Dota 2	65−70 −53.8%	100−105 +53.8%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −53.1%	75−80 +53.1%
Fortnite	45−50 −48.9%	70−75 +48.9%
Forza Horizon 4	64 −48.4%	95−100 +48.4%
Valorant	50−55 −50.9%	80−85 +50.9%

This is how RX 7600M XT and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 55% faster in 1080p
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 55% faster in 1440p
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 52% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	34.55	53.94
Recency	4 January 2023	21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	20 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	70 Watt

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has a 56.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 71.4% lower power consumption.

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7600M XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7600M XT is a notebook card while RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.