Arc 8-Core iGPU vs Radeon RX 6550M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6550M and Arc 8-Core iGPU, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6550M
2023
4 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
24.83
+32.9%

RX 6550M outperforms Arc 8-Core iGPU by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking218294
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.60no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameNavi 24Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10248
Core clock speed2000 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2840 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Wattno data
Texture fill rate181.8no data
Floating-point processing power5.816 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs64no data
Ray Tracing Cores16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth144.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6550M 24.83
+32.9%
Arc 8-Core iGPU 18.69

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6550M 20506
+66.4%
Arc 8-Core iGPU 12321

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6550M 14696
+71.7%
Arc 8-Core iGPU 8561

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX 6550M 4546
+39.2%
Arc 8-Core iGPU 3266

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD74
+106%
36
−106%
1440p23
+21.1%
19
−21.1%
4K16−18
+23.1%
13
−23.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+28.6%
40−45
−28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+35.5%
30−35
−35.5%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+31.1%
60−65
−31.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+31.6%
35−40
−31.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+30.2%
40−45
−30.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+28%
50−55
−28%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+23.1%
110−120
−23.1%
Hitman 3 45−50
+36.1%
35−40
−36.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+24.2%
90−95
−24.2%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+31.3%
60−65
−31.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+28%
50−55
−28%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+36.1%
60−65
−36.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+15.9%
85−90
−15.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+28.6%
40−45
−28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+35.5%
30−35
−35.5%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+31.1%
60−65
−31.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+31.6%
35−40
−31.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+30.2%
40−45
−30.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+28%
50−55
−28%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+23.1%
110−120
−23.1%
Hitman 3 45−50
+36.1%
35−40
−36.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+24.2%
90−95
−24.2%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+31.3%
60−65
−31.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+28%
50−55
−28%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 101
+74.1%
58
−74.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+26.2%
40−45
−26.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+15.9%
85−90
−15.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+28.6%
40−45
−28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+35.5%
30−35
−35.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+31.6%
35−40
−31.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+30.2%
40−45
−30.2%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+23.1%
110−120
−23.1%
Hitman 3 45−50
+36.1%
35−40
−36.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+176%
41
−176%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 88
+91.3%
46
−91.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 49
+104%
24
−104%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+15.9%
85−90
−15.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+28%
50−55
−28%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+30.6%
35−40
−30.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+32.1%
27−30
−32.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+31.6%
18−20
−31.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+40%
20−22
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+37.3%
100−110
−37.3%
Hitman 3 27−30
+31.8%
21−24
−31.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+31.6%
35−40
−31.6%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+35.3%
30−35
−35.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+55.9%
34
−55.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+25.2%
110−120
−25.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+32.3%
30−35
−32.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Hitman 3 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+31.3%
95−100
−31.3%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+47.4%
18−20
−47.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+36.8%
18−20
−36.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+36.4%
10−12
−36.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+36%
24−27
−36%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+114%
14
−114%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%

This is how RX 6550M and Arc 8-Core iGPU compete in popular games:

  • RX 6550M is 106% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6550M is 21% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6550M is 23% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6550M is 176% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6550M surpassed Arc 8-Core iGPU in all 66 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.83 18.69
Recency 4 January 2023 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm

RX 6550M has a 32.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc 8-Core iGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6550M is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 8-Core iGPU in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6550M
Radeon RX 6550M
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Arc 8-Core iGPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 157 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 32 votes

Rate Arc 8-Core iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.