Quadro T2000 Mobile vs Radeon RX 580 Mobile

Place in the ranking	291	271
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	22.80	no data
Power efficiency	13.41	23.83
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Polaris 20	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	18 April 2017 (7 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$301.69	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	1024
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1575 MHz
Boost clock speed	1077 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	5,700 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	155.1	114.2
Floating-point processing power	4.963 TFLOPS	3.656 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	144	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	256.0 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 580 Mobile 18.74

T2000 Mobile 19.98
+6.6%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 580 Mobile 15223
+12.6%

T2000 Mobile 13524

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	78 −2.6%	80−85 +2.6%
4K	31 +3.3%	30−35 −3.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.87	no data
4K	9.73	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −5.7%	35−40 +5.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −7.7%	40−45 +7.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −6.5%	65−70 +6.5%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −5.7%	35−40 +5.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −7.7%	40−45 +7.7%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −7.3%	85−90 +7.3%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 −5.8%	55−60 +5.8%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −5.7%	55−60 +5.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −4.4%	45−50 +4.4%
Valorant	75−80 −6.3%	80−85 +6.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −6.5%	65−70 +6.5%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −5.7%	35−40 +5.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −7.7%	40−45 +7.7%
Dota 2	66 −10.6%	70−75 +10.6%
Far Cry 5	65−70 −4.5%	65−70 +4.5%
Fortnite	68 −60.3%	100−110 +60.3%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −7.3%	85−90 +7.3%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 −5.8%	55−60 +5.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	62 −17.7%	70−75 +17.7%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −5.7%	55−60 +5.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	198 +43.5%	130−140 −43.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −4.4%	45−50 +4.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	68 +3%	65−70 −3%
Valorant	75−80 −6.3%	80−85 +6.3%
World of Tanks	220−230 −3.5%	230−240 +3.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −6.5%	65−70 +6.5%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −5.7%	35−40 +5.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −7.7%	40−45 +7.7%
Dota 2	69 −5.8%	70−75 +5.8%
Far Cry 5	65−70 −4.5%	65−70 +4.5%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −7.3%	85−90 +7.3%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 −5.8%	55−60 +5.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	58 −138%	130−140 +138%
Valorant	75−80 −6.3%	80−85 +6.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	30−35 −6.5%	30−35 +6.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −9.7%	30−35 +9.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −1.2%	170−180 +1.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −11.8%	18−20 +11.8%
World of Tanks	130−140 −5.3%	140−150 +5.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −5%	40−45 +5%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −6.3%	16−18 +6.3%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −9.6%	55−60 +9.6%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −8%	50−55 +8%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 −6.5%	30−35 +6.5%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −6.8%	45−50 +6.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −7.4%	27−30 +7.4%
Valorant	50−55 −8%	50−55 +8%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Dota 2	30−35 −6.1%	35−40 +6.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −6.1%	35−40 +6.1%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −7.1%	14−16 +7.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −8.6%	60−65 +8.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −6.1%	35−40 +6.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −10.5%	21−24 +10.5%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Dota 2	30−35 −6.1%	35−40 +6.1%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −8%	27−30 +8%
Fortnite	21−24 −8.7%	24−27 +8.7%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −6.9%	30−35 +6.9%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −6.3%	16−18 +6.3%
Valorant	21−24 −8.7%	24−27 +8.7%

This is how RX 580 Mobile and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

T2000 Mobile is 3% faster in 1080p
RX 580 Mobile is 3% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 580 Mobile is 43% faster.
in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 138% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 580 Mobile is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
T2000 Mobile is ahead in 59 tests (92%)
there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	18.74	19.98
Recency	18 April 2017	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	60 Watt

RX 580 Mobile has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 6.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 580 Mobile and Quadro T2000 Mobile.

Be aware that Radeon RX 580 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.