Radeon R9 M385 vs R9 M295X

Place in performance ranking	359	579
Place by popularity	not in top-100	89
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.42
Architecture	GCN 3 (2014−2016)	GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code name	Tonga	Strato
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	16 October 2014 (9 years ago)	16 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Current price	no data	$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	896
Core clock speed	723 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	1100 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	92.54	56.00
Floating-point performance	2,961 gflops	1,792 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 M295X and Radeon R9 M385 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	Not Listed	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	0 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	Not Listed	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	76.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Eyefinity	no data	1

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	-	-
Enduro	-	-
FreeSync	1	1
HD3D	+	+
PowerTune	+	+
DualGraphics	1	1
TrueAudio	-	+
ZeroCore	+	+
Switchable graphics	1	1

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	Not Listed	DirectX® 12
Shader Model	6.3	6.3
OpenGL	4.4	4.4
OpenCL	Not Listed	Not Listed
Mantle	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M295X 13.34
+150%

R9 M385 5.33

R9 M295X outperforms R9 M385 by 150% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 M295X 5150
+150%

R9 M385 2060

R9 M295X outperforms R9 M385 by 150% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	48 +167%	18−20 −167%
4K	27 +170%	10−12 −170%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

21−24

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24	no data
Battlefield 5	40−45	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24	no data
Far Cry 5	30−35	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40	no data
Forza Horizon 4	60−65	no data
Hitman 3	24−27	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55	no data
Metro Exodus	40−45	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24	no data
Battlefield 5	40−45	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24	no data
Far Cry 5	30−35	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40	no data
Forza Horizon 4	60−65	no data
Hitman 3	24−27	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55	no data
Metro Exodus	40−45	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	37	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24	no data
Far Cry 5	30−35	no data
Forza Horizon 4	60−65	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8	no data
Far Cry 5	21−24	no data
Forza Horizon 4	24−27	no data
Hitman 3	16−18	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30	no data
Metro Exodus	21−24	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +156%	9−10 −156%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11	no data
Hitman 3	9−10	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14	no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	no data
Far Cry 5	7−8	no data
Forza Horizon 4	18−20	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16	no data
Metro Exodus	12−14	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6	no data