Quadro P2200 vs Radeon R9 390X

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

R9 390X
2015
0 MB GDDR5
24.39
+1.3%

Radeon R9 390X outperforms Quadro P2200 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking207210
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation12.6232.24
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGrenada XTGP106
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date16 June 2015 (8 years ago)10 June 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 no data
Current price$19.99 (0x MSRP)$409

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P2200 has 155% better value for money than R9 390X.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28161280
Core clock speedno data1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz1493 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate184.8119.4
Floating-point performance5,914 gflopsno data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length275 mm201 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pinNone
Bridgeless CrossFire1no data

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5X
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount0 MB5 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz10008 MHz
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s200.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort
Eyefinity+no data
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support+no data

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D-no data
PowerTune+no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore-no data
VCE+no data
DDMA audio+no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
Mantle+no data
CUDAno data6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 390X 24.39
+1.3%
Quadro P2200 24.08

Radeon R9 390X outperforms Quadro P2200 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 390X 9442
+1.3%
Quadro P2200 9323

Radeon R9 390X outperforms Quadro P2200 by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD91
+7.1%
85−90
−7.1%
4K47
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+5.3%
75−80
−5.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+2.5%
80−85
−2.5%
Hitman 3 70−75
+4.3%
70−75
−4.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+4%
50−55
−4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+8%
50−55
−8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+5.3%
75−80
−5.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+2.5%
80−85
−2.5%
Hitman 3 70−75
+4.3%
70−75
−4.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+4%
50−55
−4%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+8%
50−55
−8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+1.3%
75−80
−1.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+5.3%
75−80
−5.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+2.5%
80−85
−2.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Hitman 3 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+8%
50−55
−8%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Hitman 3 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%

This is how R9 390X and Quadro P2200 compete in popular games:

  • R9 390X is 7.1% faster than Quadro P2200 in 1080p
  • R9 390X is 4.4% faster than Quadro P2200 in 4K

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 24.39 24.08
Recency 16 June 2015 10 June 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 75 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon R9 390X and Quadro P2200.

Be aware that Radeon R9 390X is a desktop card while Quadro P2200 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 390X
Radeon R9 390X
NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Quadro P2200

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 235 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 306 votes

Rate Quadro P2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.