Quadro P2200 vs Radeon R9 390X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 390X with Quadro P2200, including specs and performance data.

R9 390X
2015
0 MB GDDR5, 275 Watt
21.05

P2200 outperforms R9 390X by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking276273
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.26no data
Power efficiency6.1622.72
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGrenadaGP106
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (10 years ago)10 June 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28161280
Core clock speedno data1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz1493 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate184.8119.4
Floating-point processing power5.914 TFLOPS3.822 TFLOPS
ROPs6440
TMUs17680
L1 Cache704 KB480 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB1280 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length275 mm201 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pinNone
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5X
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount0 MB5 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz1251 MHz
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s200.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
Mantle+-
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 390X 21.05
Quadro P2200 21.19
+0.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 390X Samples: 1318 9309
Quadro P2200 Samples: 1291 9368
+0.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD91
+1.1%
90−95
−1.1%
4K48
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.71no data
4K8.94no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+6.7%
120−130
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+1.1%
90−95
−1.1%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+6.7%
120−130
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Fortnite 110−120
+3.6%
110−120
−3.6%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+2.9%
70−75
−2.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+3.5%
85−90
−3.5%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+1.1%
90−95
−1.1%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+6.7%
120−130
−6.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0.4%
250−260
−0.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Dota 2 110−120
+8.2%
110−120
−8.2%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Fortnite 110−120
+3.6%
110−120
−3.6%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+2.9%
70−75
−2.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+3.8%
80−85
−3.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+3.5%
85−90
−3.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+1.3%
75−80
−1.3%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+1.1%
90−95
−1.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Dota 2 110−120
+8.2%
110−120
−8.2%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+3.5%
85−90
−3.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+3.6%
110−120
−3.6%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+1.3%
160−170
−1.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+2.4%
170−180
−2.4%
Valorant 190−200
+3.7%
190−200
−3.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+4%
50−55
−4%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+5.5%
55−60
−5.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+8%
50−55
−8%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Valorant 130−140
+1.5%
130−140
−1.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how R9 390X and Quadro P2200 compete in popular games:

  • R9 390X is 1% faster in 1080p
  • R9 390X is 7% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.05 21.19
Recency 18 June 2015 10 June 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro P2200 has a 0.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 266.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon R9 390X and Quadro P2200.

Be aware that Radeon R9 390X is a desktop graphics card while Quadro P2200 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 390X
Radeon R9 390X
NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Quadro P2200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 281 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 430 votes

Rate Quadro P2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 390X or Quadro P2200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.