Quadro P2200 vs Radeon R9 370 1024SP

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated230
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.46
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTrinidadGP106
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 June 2015 (9 years ago)10 June 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241280
Core clock speed925 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed975 MHz1493 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate62.40119.4
Floating-point processing power1.997 TFLOPS3.822 TFLOPS
ROPs3240
TMUs6480

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data201 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB5 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz1251 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s200.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 June 2015 10 June 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 5 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro P2200 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 370 1024SP and Quadro P2200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 370 1024SP is a desktop card while Quadro P2200 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 370 1024SP
Radeon R9 370 1024SP
NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Quadro P2200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.1 297 votes

Rate Radeon R9 370 1024SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 355 votes

Rate Quadro P2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.