GeForce GTX 850A vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) with GeForce GTX 850A, including specs and performance data.

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
2014
2.54
+47.7%

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) outperforms GTX 850A by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking845957
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.91
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameKaveri SpectreGM107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 January 2014 (11 years ago)17 March 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384640
Core clock speed720 MHz902 MHz
Boost clock speedno data936 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt
Texture fill rateno data37.44
Floating-point processing powerno data1.198 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
God of War 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Fortnite 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
God of War 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Valorant 40−45
+59.3%
27−30
−59.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+66.7%
30−33
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Dota 2 24−27
+62.5%
16−18
−62.5%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Fortnite 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
God of War 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
+50%
6−7
−50%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Valorant 40−45
+59.3%
27−30
−59.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Dota 2 24−27
+62.5%
16−18
−62.5%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
God of War 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Valorant 40−45
+59.3%
27−30
−59.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Valorant 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
God of War 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Valorant 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
God of War 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

This is how R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and GTX 850A compete in popular games:

  • R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is 56% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.54 1.72
Recency 14 January 2014 17 March 2014

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) has a 47.7% higher aggregate performance score.

GTX 850A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months.

The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 850A in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 850A is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850A
GeForce GTX 850A

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 21 votes

Rate Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 850A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) or GeForce GTX 850A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.