AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L): specs and benchmarks

AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)

Summary

This is GCN 1.1 architecture notebook card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at office use.

It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 2.57 percent of a leader's which is AMD Radeon R9 390 X2.

General info

Of Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)'s architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
 
Architecture
GCN 1.1
 
Code name
Beema
 
Type
Laptop
 
Release date
n/d
 

Technical specs

Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)'s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)'s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines
128
 
of 8192 (Radeon Pro Duo)
Boost Clock
850 MHz
 
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
of 12

Memory specs

Parameters of memory installed on Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L): its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory bus width
64 Bit
 
of 8192 (Radeon Pro Duo)
Shared memory
+
 

API support

APIs supported by Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX
12 (FL 12_0)
 

Video card benchmarks performance

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L). Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
2.52
 
 
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
36807.00
 
 
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
3317.00
 
 
3DMark Fire Strike Score
510.00
 
 
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
539.00
 
 
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
764.00
 
 
3DMark Vantage Performance
2698.00
 
 

Game benchmarks (in FPS)

Let's see how good Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS, while overall gaming performance is a number in 0-100 range, and the older the game, the less impact it has on the overall grade.
Overall gaming performance
0.02
 
 
Games can run, %
At minimum settings
96.45
At recommended settings
87.74
New games support
44
Games benchmarked by notebookcheck.net
Far Cry 5 (2018)
low / 720p
7.00
 
Fortnite (2018)
low / 720p
16.20
 
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018)
low / 720p
8.60
 
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017)
low / 720p
8.80
 
medium / 1080p
2.90
 
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017)
low / 720p
11.20
 
Resident Evil 7 (2017)
low / 720p
19.80
 
medium / 1080p
11.90
 
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017)
low / 720p
6.10
 
Battlefield 1 (BF1) (2016)
low / 720p
13.20
 
medium / 768p
9.30
 
Civilization VI (2016)
low / 768p
18.30
 
medium / 768p
7.00
 
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)
low / 720p
7.70
 
medium / 768p
5.60
 
Dishonored 2 (2016)
low / 720p
7.10
 
medium / 768p
5.10
 
Doom (2016)
low / 720p
9.30
 
Far Cry Primal (2016)
low / 720p
10.00
 
medium / 1080p
5.00
 
Overwatch (2016)
low / 720p
20.40
 
medium / 768p
17.10
 
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
low / 768p
11.00
 
medium / 768p
6.70
 
The Division (2016)
low / 720p
12.30
 
medium / 768p
7.00
 
Titanfall 2 (2016)
low / 720p
17.60
 
medium / 768p
14.70
 
XCOM 2 (2016)
low / 720p
9.90
 
medium / 1080p
2.50
 
Dota 2 (2015)
low / 720p
26.20
 
medium / 768p
21.00
 
Fallout 4 (2015)
low / 720p
13.40
 
medium / 768p
7.80
 
GTA V (2015)
low / 768p
24.60
 
medium / 768p
20.70
 
Just Cause 3 (2015)
low / 768p
10.80
 
medium / 768p
8.70
 
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
low / 768p
24.80
 
medium / 768p
15.00
 
The Witcher 3 (2015)
low / 768p
9.40
 
medium / 768p
6.20
 
Far Cry 4 (2014)
low / 768p
14.30
 
medium / 768p
10.70
 
Sims 4 (2014)
low / 768p
57.90
 
medium / 768p
25.20
 
Battlefield 4 (2013)
low / 768p
21.90
 
medium / 768p
15.85
 
high / 768p
10.50
 
Crysis 3 (2013)
low / 768p
12.10
 
medium / 768p
7.40
 
high / 768p
3.10
 
ultra / 1080p
1.10
 
Tomb Raider (2013)
low / 768p
34.00
 
medium / 768p
17.80
 
high / 768p
12.00
 
ultra / 1080p
1.30
 
X-Plane 10.25 (2013)
low / 768p
27.40
 
medium / 768p
16.70
 
high / 768p
6.30
 
ultra / 1080p
2.70
 
Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
low / 768p
35.40
 
medium / 768p
35.30
 
high / 768p
27.60
 
Diablo III (2012)
low / 768p
44.70
 
medium / 768p
30.10
 
high / 768p
23.10
 
ultra / 1080p
14.20
 
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
low / 720p
28.70
 
medium / 768p
13.20
 
high / 768p
10.20
 
ultra / 1080p
4.70
 
World of Warcraft (2005)
low / 600p
75.80
 
medium / 768p
52.40
 

Relative perfomance

Overall Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) performance compared to its nearest competitors. All GPU types participate.

NVIDIA equivalent

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) from NVIDIA is GeForce 9700M GT, which is slower by 4% and lower by 10 positions in our rating.

Choose a GPU

Compare GPUs

vs

Compare Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) with others

Other GPUs

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.