GeForce GT 420M: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

GeForce GT 420M provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 0.89% of a leader's which is RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell.

Summary

NVIDIA started GeForce GT 420M sales 3 September 2010. This is a Fermi architecture notebook card based on 40 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at office use. 1 GB of DDR3 memory clocked at 0.8 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is a graphics card attached via PCIe 2.0 x16 interface. Power consumption is at 23 Watt.

Primary details

Some basic facts about GeForce GT 420M: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in the ranking1157
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Power efficiency3.11of 100.00 (Radeon 890M)
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGF108
Market segmentLaptop
Release date3 September 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

GeForce GT 420M's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce GT 420M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96of 960 (GeForce GTX 660)
Core clock speed500 MHzof 980 (GeForce GT 755M SLI)
Number of transistors585 millionof 100,000 million (Data Center GPU Max 1100)
Manufacturing process technology40 nmof 0.003 MB (Arc Graphics 140V)
Power consumption (TDP)23 Wattof 235 (FirePro S9150)
Texture fill rate8.000of 1,968 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell)
Floating-point processing power0.192 TFLOPSof 126 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell)
ROPs4of 512 (Moore Threads MTT S4000)
TMUs16of 896 (Data Center GPU Max 1350)
L1 Cache128 KBof 64 MB (Data Center GPU Max 1550)
L2 Cache256 KBof 408 MB (Data Center GPU Max 1350)

Form factor & compatibility

This section provides details about the physical dimensions of GeForce GT 420M and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of memory installed on GeForce GT 420M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory typeDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GBof 288 GB (Radeon Instinct MI325X)
Memory bus width128 Bitof 384 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti)
Memory clock speed800 MHzof 16384000 MB (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile)
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sof 983040 MB (GeForce RTX 5080)
Shared memory-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce GT 420M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs

API and SDK support

APIs supported by GeForce GT 420M, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX12 API
Shader Model5.1
OpenGL4.5of 4.6 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell)
OpenCL1.1
VulkanN/A
CUDA+

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of GeForce GT 420M. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 420M
0.89

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 420M Samples: 354 393

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 420M 685

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 420M 3051

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GT 420M 1583

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

GT 420M 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good GeForce GT 420M is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

900p12
Full HD18

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
Far Cry 5 2−3
Fortnite 1−2
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
Forza Horizon 5 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
Valorant 30−35

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
Dota 2 14−16
Far Cry 5 2−3
Fortnite 1−2
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
Forza Horizon 5 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
Metro Exodus 1−2
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
Valorant 30−35

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
Dota 2 14−16
Far Cry 5 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
Valorant 30−35

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
Valorant 5−6

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3

Closest competitors

GeForce GT 420M's performance relative to its closest rivals among notebook graphics cards.


AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to GeForce GT 420M is Radeon R4 (Beema), which is faster by 1% and higher by 3 positions in our ranking.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GT 420M:

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with GeForce GT 420M according to our statistics.

All comparisons with GeForce GT 420M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


2.7 130 votes

Rate GeForce GT 420M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 420M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.