ATI Radeon 9200 SE vs R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11531602
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 (2014)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameBeemaRV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 April 2014 (11 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speedno data200 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data28 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.8
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)8.1
OpenGLno data1.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 no data

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
Fortnite 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
Fortnite 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 no data
Metro Exodus 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12 no data
Valorant 0−1 no data

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 5−6 no data

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 April 2014 1 March 2003
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) and Radeon 9200 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9200 SE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)
Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)
ATI Radeon 9200 SE
Radeon 9200 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 21 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 71 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) or Radeon 9200 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.