Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Radeon Pro WX 4150

Place in the ranking	560	528
Place by popularity	not in top-100	65
Power efficiency	9.40	18.57
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	Baffin	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 March 2017 (7 years ago)	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	80
Core clock speed	1002 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1053 MHz	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	58.97	no data
Floating-point processing power	1.887 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	no data
TMUs	56	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	-
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12_1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	16−18 −18.8%	19 +18.8%
1440p	9−10 −11.1%	10 +11.1%
4K	14−16 −21.4%	17 +21.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−12

−27.3%

14
+27.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −11.8%	18−20 +11.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −111%	19 +111%
Battlefield 5	18−20 −15.8%	21−24 +15.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −7.1%	14−16 +7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −18.2%	13 +18.2%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −13.3%	16−18 +13.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −10.5%	21−24 +10.5%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −8.9%	45−50 +8.9%
Hitman 3	12−14 −23.1%	16 +23.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −7.5%	40−45 +7.5%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −100%	38 +100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −5.3%	20−22 +5.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −8.7%	24−27 +8.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −17%	62 +17%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −11.8%	18−20 +11.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −77.8%	16 +77.8%
Battlefield 5	18−20 −15.8%	21−24 +15.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −7.1%	14−16 +7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +10%	10 −10%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −13.3%	16−18 +13.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −10.5%	21−24 +10.5%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −8.9%	45−50 +8.9%
Hitman 3	12−14 −15.4%	15 +15.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −7.5%	40−45 +7.5%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −42.1%	27 +42.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −5.3%	20−22 +5.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −4.3%	24 +4.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −4.8%	21−24 +4.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +8.2%	49 −8.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −11.8%	18−20 +11.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −7.1%	14−16 +7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +37.5%	8 −37.5%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −13.3%	16−18 +13.3%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −8.9%	45−50 +8.9%
Hitman 3	12−14 +8.3%	12 −8.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +150%	16 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +15%	20 −15%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +90.9%	11 −90.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −3.8%	55−60 +3.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−5.3%

20−22
+5.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −7.7%	14−16 +7.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −17.4%	27−30 +17.4%
Hitman 3	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −300%	16 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −66.7%	10 +66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −9.3%	45−50 +9.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−8.3%

12−14
+8.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Hitman 3	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −25%	24−27 +25%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8

+0%

7−8

+0%

This is how Pro WX 4150 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 19% faster in 1080p
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 11% faster in 1440p
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 21% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro WX 4150 is 150% faster.
in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Pro WX 4150 is ahead in 7 tests (10%)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is ahead in 56 tests (78%)
there's a draw in 9 tests (13%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.85	7.58
Recency	1 March 2017	15 August 2020
Chip lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	28 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has a 10.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 78.6% lower power consumption.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4150 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a mobile workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.