Radeon RX 7600M XT vs Pro Vega 56

Place in performance ranking	164	172
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.98	no data
Architecture	Vega (2017−2021)	RDNA 3
GPU code name	Vega	Navi 33
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	14 December 2017 (6 years ago)	5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	no data
Current price	$4999 (12.5x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	2048
Core clock speed	1247 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz	2300 MHz
Number of transistors	12,500 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	210 Watt	120 Watt (75 - 120 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	280.0	320.0
Floating-point performance	9,677 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro Vega 56 and Radeon RX 7600M XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	IGP	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	786 MHz	18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	402.4 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	Portable Device Dependent
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.125	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega 56 31.92
+5.3%

RX 7600M XT 30.32

Pro Vega 56 outperforms RX 7600M XT by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro Vega 56 12353
+5.3%

RX 7600M XT 11733

Pro Vega 56 outperforms RX 7600M XT by 5% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Pro Vega 56 25589

RX 7600M XT 36365
+42.1%

RX 7600M XT outperforms Pro Vega 56 by 42% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Pro Vega 56 17797

RX 7600M XT 28271
+58.9%

RX 7600M XT outperforms Pro Vega 56 by 59% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	99 −19.2%	118 +19.2%
1440p	65−70 +4.8%	62 −4.8%
4K	57 +72.7%	33 −72.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

50−55
+8%

50−55

−8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −108%	125 +108%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 −155%	143 +155%
Battlefield 5	95−100 +5.4%	90−95 −5.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	85−90 +7.5%	80−85 −7.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +8%	50−55 −8%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −52.4%	125 +52.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 −35%	108 +35%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −132%	237 +132%
Hitman 3	95−100 +7.6%	90−95 −7.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −69.6%	117 +69.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +6.3%	45−50 −6.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 −107%	153 +107%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −127%	136 +127%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −90%	114 +90%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 −107%	116 +107%
Battlefield 5	95−100 +5.4%	90−95 −5.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	85−90 +7.5%	80−85 −7.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +8%	50−55 −8%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −47.6%	121 +47.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 −31.3%	105 +31.3%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −128%	233 +128%
Hitman 3	95−100 +7.6%	90−95 −7.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −46.4%	101 +46.4%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −69.1%	93 +69.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +6.3%	45−50 −6.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 −70.3%	126 +70.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	116 −48.3%	172 +48.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −105%	123 +105%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −31.7%	79 +31.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 −66.1%	93 +66.1%
Battlefield 5	95−100 +5.4%	90−95 −5.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +8%	50−55 −8%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −36.6%	112 +36.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 −17.5%	94 +17.5%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −70.6%	174 +70.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	64 −56.3%	100 +56.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +22.4%	49 −22.4%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +8.5%	45−50 −8.5%
Hitman 3	55−60 +7.7%	50−55 −7.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −83.7%	79 +83.7%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −70.6%	58 +70.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +8.7%	21−24 −8.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −64.4%	74 +64.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −71.4%	60 +71.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 −97.1%	67 +97.1%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +4.5%	65−70 −4.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +9.5%	21−24 −9.5%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −77.2%	101 +77.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 −49.2%	91 +49.2%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −109%	138 +109%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −71.4%	72 +71.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −25.9%	34 +25.9%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +8%	24−27 −8%
Hitman 3	30−35 +6.9%	27−30 −6.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +4.8%	21 −4.8%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −66.7%	35 +66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −37.5%	33 +37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	42 −23.8%	52 +23.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −38.1%	29 +38.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −52.6%	29 +52.6%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +8.3%	35−40 −8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −72.4%	50 +72.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −75%	56 +75%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −97.8%	89 +97.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −6.3%	17 +6.3%

This is how Pro Vega 56 and RX 7600M XT compete in popular games:

RX 7600M XT is 19.2% faster than Pro Vega 56 in 1080p
Pro Vega 56 is 4.8% faster than RX 7600M XT in 1440p
Pro Vega 56 is 72.7% faster than RX 7600M XT in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro Vega 56 is 22.4% faster than the RX 7600M XT.
in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 7600M XT is 155% faster than the Pro Vega 56.

All in all, in popular games: