GeForce RTX 5070 Ti vs GRID M3-3020

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID M3-3020 with GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, including specs and performance data.

GRID M3-3020
2016
4 GB GDDR5
6.61

RTX 5070 Ti outperforms GRID M3-3020 by a whopping 992% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5378
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data54.36
Power efficiencyno data19.15
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGM107GB203
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 May 2016 (8 years ago)20 February 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$749

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6408960
Core clock speed1033 MHz2300 MHz
Boost clock speed1306 MHz2452 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rate52.24686.6
Floating-point processing power1.672 TFLOPS43.94 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs40280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm304 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1300 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth83.2 GB/s896.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.4
CUDA5.010.1
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12−14
−1167%
152
+1167%
1440p10−12
−1060%
116
+1060%
4K7−8
−1086%
83
+1086%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.93
1440pno data6.46
4Kno data9.02

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Atomic Heart 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Far Cry 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%
Atomic Heart 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Far Cry 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Metro Exodus 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%
Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Far Cry 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 240
+0%
240
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%
Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 199
+0%
199
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Atomic Heart 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 183
+0%
183
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how GRID M3-3020 and RTX 5070 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5070 Ti is 1167% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5070 Ti is 1060% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5070 Ti is 1086% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.61 72.15
Recency 18 May 2016 20 February 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

RTX 5070 Ti has a 991.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID M3-3020 in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID M3-3020 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
GRID M3-3020
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5
1 vote

Rate GRID M3-3020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9
689 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID M3-3020 or GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.