RX 6600 XT vs Pro 5300M

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Pro 5300M
15.47

RX 6600 XT outperforms Pro 5300M by 175% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking31878
Place by popularitynot in top-10056
Value for money3.6446.75
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA (2019−2020)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 14Navi 23
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date13 November 2019 (4 years old)30 July 2021 (2 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379
Current price$2068 $283 (0.7x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6600 XT has 1184% better value for money than Pro 5300M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802048
Core clock speedno data1968 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz2589 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt160 (TGP) Watt
Texture fill rate100.0331.4

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro 5300M and Radeon RX 6600 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data190 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 5300M 15.47
RX 6600 XT 42.48
+175%

RX 6600 XT outperforms Pro 5300M by 175% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro 5300M 5996
RX 6600 XT 16463
+175%

RX 6600 XT outperforms Pro 5300M by 175% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
−193%
132
+193%
1440p24−27
−208%
74
+208%
4K14−16
−193%
41
+193%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−229%
79
+229%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−131%
70−75
+131%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−396%
129
+396%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−126%
120−130
+126%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−190%
110−120
+190%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−225%
78
+225%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−278%
151
+278%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−212%
131
+212%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−137%
120−130
+137%
Hitman 3 40−45
−414%
221
+414%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−315%
137
+315%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−162%
65−70
+162%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−419%
166
+419%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−314%
120
+314%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−131%
70−75
+131%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−308%
106
+308%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−126%
120−130
+126%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−190%
110−120
+190%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−217%
76
+217%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−253%
141
+253%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−202%
127
+202%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−137%
120−130
+137%
Hitman 3 40−45
−326%
183
+326%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−230%
109
+230%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−296%
95
+296%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−162%
65−70
+162%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−344%
142
+344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−433%
176
+433%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−259%
104
+259%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−131%
70−75
+131%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−188%
75
+188%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−126%
120−130
+126%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−188%
69
+188%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−233%
133
+233%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−167%
112
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−137%
120−130
+137%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−200%
99
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−110%
61
+110%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−213%
70−75
+213%
Hitman 3 24−27
−367%
112
+367%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−262%
76
+262%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−300%
56
+300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
−320%
84
+320%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−188%
45−50
+188%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−331%
56
+331%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−167%
85−90
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−400%
40
+400%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−320%
105
+320%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−238%
98
+238%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−203%
90−95
+203%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−300%
60−65
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−340%
44
+340%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Hitman 3 14−16
−307%
57
+307%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−81.8%
20
+81.8%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−325%
34
+325%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−188%
21−24
+188%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−344%
40
+344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−260%
54
+260%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−222%
27−30
+222%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−300%
28
+300%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−206%
50−55
+206%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14
+367%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−325%
51
+325%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−253%
53
+253%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−186%
60−65
+186%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−300%
24
+300%

This is how Pro 5300M and RX 6600 XT compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RX 6600 XT is 193% faster than Pro 5300M

1440p resolution:

  • RX 6600 XT is 208% faster than Pro 5300M

4K resolution:

  • RX 6600 XT is 193% faster than Pro 5300M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6600 XT is 433% faster than the Pro 5300M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6600 XT surpassed Pro 5300M in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 15.47 42.48
Recency 13 November 2019 30 July 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 160 Watt

The Radeon RX 6600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5300M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6600 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 158 votes

Rate AMD Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3516 votes

Rate AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.