Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

HD 8970M Crossfire
2012
18.97

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire by 157% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking27257
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money32.3810.05
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameNeptune CFTU102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 May 2012 (11 years old)13 August 2018 (5 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,299
Current price$170 $3083 (0.5x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD 8970M Crossfire has 222% better value for money than RTX 6000.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25604608
Core clock speed850 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rateno data509.8

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire and Quadro RTX 6000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data24 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data672.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.112 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkanno data1.2.131
CUDAno data7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70
−143%
170−180
+143%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−150%
75−80
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−156%
100−105
+156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−142%
80−85
+142%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−150%
160−170
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−145%
120−130
+145%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−150%
75−80
+150%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−140%
120−130
+140%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−155%
130−140
+155%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−142%
160−170
+142%
Hitman 3 50−55
−141%
130−140
+141%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−150%
100−105
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−142%
75−80
+142%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−150%
100−105
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−150%
90−95
+150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−156%
100−105
+156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−142%
80−85
+142%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−150%
160−170
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−145%
120−130
+145%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−150%
75−80
+150%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−140%
120−130
+140%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−155%
130−140
+155%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−142%
160−170
+142%
Hitman 3 50−55
−141%
130−140
+141%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−150%
100−105
+150%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−150%
75−80
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−142%
75−80
+142%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−150%
100−105
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−144%
100−105
+144%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−150%
90−95
+150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−156%
100−105
+156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−142%
80−85
+142%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−150%
160−170
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−150%
75−80
+150%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−140%
120−130
+140%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−155%
130−140
+155%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−142%
160−170
+142%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−144%
100−105
+144%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−150%
90−95
+150%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−150%
70−75
+150%
Hitman 3 30−33
−150%
75−80
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−140%
60−65
+140%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−138%
100−105
+138%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−150%
90−95
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−150%
95−100
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−138%
50−55
+138%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Hitman 3 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−150%
55−60
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−141%
65−70
+141%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%

This is how HD 8970M Crossfire and RTX 6000 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RTX 6000 is 143% faster than HD 8970M Crossfire

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 18.97 48.73
Recency 1 May 2012 13 August 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 260 Watt

The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is a notebook card while Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 4 votes

Rate AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 122 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.