GeForce MX350 vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire and GeForce MX350, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 6970M Crossfire
2011
2x2 GB GDDR5
9.01
+23.3%

HD 6970M Crossfire outperforms MX350 by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking486538
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data25.16
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameBlackcomb XTGP107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2011 (14 years ago)10 February 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1920640
Core clock speed680 MHz747 MHz
Boost clock speedno data937 MHz
Number of transistors2x1700 Million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data20 Watt
Texture fill rateno data29.98
Floating-point processing powerno data1.199 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1752 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data56.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6970M Crossfire 9.01
+23.3%
GeForce MX350 7.31

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 6970M Crossfire 5542
GeForce MX350 6166
+11.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p94
+25.3%
75−80
−25.3%
Full HD98
+263%
27
−263%
1440p35−40
+12.9%
31
−12.9%
4K30−35
+15.4%
26
−15.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+21.4%
14
−21.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Elden Ring 24−27
+25%
20
−25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+7.4%
27
−7.4%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+54.5%
11
−54.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+260%
5
−260%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+12.5%
32
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−16.7%
28
+16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−33.3%
32
+33.3%
Valorant 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+26.1%
21−24
−26.1%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+350%
4
−350%
Dota 2 30−35
−59.4%
51
+59.4%
Elden Ring 24−27
+92.3%
13
−92.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−31.6%
50
+31.6%
Fortnite 50−55
+23.3%
40−45
−23.3%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+44%
25
−44%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−9.4%
35
+9.4%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+41.2%
17
−41.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−19.7%
85
+19.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+17.4%
21−24
−17.4%
Valorant 30−35
+52.4%
21
−52.4%
World of Tanks 130−140
+10.8%
120
−10.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+70.6%
17
−70.6%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+500%
3
−500%
Dota 2 30−35
−138%
76
+138%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−5.3%
40
+5.3%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+89.5%
19
−89.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+20.3%
55−60
−20.3%
Valorant 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Elden Ring 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
World of Tanks 65−70
+22.6%
50−55
−22.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Valorant 21−24
+15.8%
18−20
−15.8%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Dota 2 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Elden Ring 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
−57.9%
30
+57.9%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Fortnite 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Valorant 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

This is how HD 6970M Crossfire and GeForce MX350 compete in popular games:

  • HD 6970M Crossfire is 25% faster in 900p
  • HD 6970M Crossfire is 263% faster in 1080p
  • HD 6970M Crossfire is 13% faster in 1440p
  • HD 6970M Crossfire is 15% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 6970M Crossfire is 500% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce MX350 is 138% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 6970M Crossfire is ahead in 52 tests (83%)
  • GeForce MX350 is ahead in 9 tests (14%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.01 7.31
Recency 6 January 2011 10 February 2020
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm

HD 6970M Crossfire has a 23.3% higher aggregate performance score.

GeForce MX350, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX350 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GeForce MX350

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1639 votes

Rate GeForce MX350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.