Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs GeForce GTX 965M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 965M SLI and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 965M SLI
2015
2x 4 GB GDDR5
17.30
+90.1%

GTX 965M SLI outperforms HD 6970M Crossfire by an impressive 90% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking295448
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation32.107.57
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameno dataBlackcomb XT
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 January 2015 (9 years ago)6 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Current price$149 $170

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 965M SLI has 324% better value for money than HD 6970M Crossfire.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481920
Core clock speed924 MHz680 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors2x 5200 Million2x1700 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 965M SLI and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB2x2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz900 MHz
Shared memory--

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_111
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 965M SLI 17.30
+90.1%
HD 6970M Crossfire 9.10

GeForce GTX 965M SLI outperforms Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire by 90% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 965M SLI 14428
+160%
HD 6970M Crossfire 5542

GeForce GTX 965M SLI outperforms Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire by 160% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p170−180
+80.9%
94
−80.9%
Full HD71
−35.2%
96
+35.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30 no data
Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 no data
Far Cry 5 40−45 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 80−85 no data
Hitman 3 30−35 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70 no data
Metro Exodus 55−60 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30 no data
Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 no data
Far Cry 5 40−45 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 80−85 no data
Hitman 3 30−35 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70 no data
Metro Exodus 55−60 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 no data
Far Cry 5 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 4 80−85 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 no data
Hitman 3 20−22 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40 no data
Metro Exodus 30−35 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14 no data
Hitman 3 12−14 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20 no data
Metro Exodus 16−18 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 no data

This is how GTX 965M SLI and HD 6970M Crossfire compete in popular games:

  • GTX 965M SLI is 81% faster in 900p
  • HD 6970M Crossfire is 35% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.30 9.10
Recency 5 January 2015 6 January 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI
GeForce GTX 965M SLI
AMD Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 965M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.